No 10 fails to rule out tax rises to pay for Starmer’s welfare reform climbdown

Downing Street could not exclude tax increases to pay for a potential U -turn of Sir Keir Starmer’s welfare reforms of £ 5 billion.

Sir Keir is thinking of compromising to save the benefit cuts after signing a change of more than 120 workers’ deputies. However, there are increasing questions about how to finance a climb.

When asked whether the government would be forced to increase taxes, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman added that the ministers would like to take the changes “right ve and that the chancellor would take tax decisions in the future in the future”.

The upper economists came because the inability to pass the reforms would be warned that Rachel Reeves will wipe the financial desk this fall, so expenditures would have to be made in other places to wear the gap.

TORY leader Kemi Badenoch said that Sir Keir was “in the war of his life” after former workers’ Minister Lord Blunkett warned that if his prosperity plans were rejected.

While the tensions were rising, there were reports of deputies in tears after interviews with consultants No. 10.

On Thursday, Sir Keir insisted on the need for reforms, reported that the demand holders were “failed every day by a“ broken system ”, but admitted that workers’ deputies wanted to see the reform of the justice values”.

However, the rebels said: Independent If they were to be accepted, any concession would have to be wide.

Currently, plans to be voted on Tuesday limit the element of universal credit (UC) disease to restrict the suitability for personal independence payments (PIP), the main disability payment in the UK. The government hopes that more people will return to work and save up to £ 5 billion per year.

The existing plaintiffs will be given a 13 -week stage stage as a movement that is seen as a movement to get rid of the opposition by softening the effect of changes before the rebellion of this week explodes.

Labor MPs, the government’s PIP payments, which are thought to include great concessions, he says. It seems that some rebels believe that the changes may be enough to see that changes have passed the second reading in Commons next week, while others are still plans to vote.

The rebellion comes at a time when workers’ deputies are increasingly criticizing the prime minister’s participation in the commons, and in the first year he voted from Sir Tony to Sir Tony Blair – forcing his backbencher to take part in difficult votes.

Rachael Maskell, who was formerly a member of Commons Health and Social Care Committee Independent The government would have to accept a large number of changes if they gained support.

He said: “[Ministers would need to] … Accept a consultancy with disabled people, first they will have to end the cuts to the PIP without changing it with a fair system, and they will not have to reduce the universal loan, because it still leaves disabled people worse because they have a significant higher life costs. Scope [charity] He evaluated this as more than 1,000 £ per month. “

Another workers’ deputy warned that the only solution that the government could offer is that the bill is completely withdrawn and that the deputies are less likely to accept less.

“I will not support anything that will put people with disabilities in trouble,” he said. “The government does not listen.

“He does not see any 10 deputies as irritating and feed. The disrespect that comes out of there … We all work hard and treat us like this.

Another Labor Party deputy called out that some of the plans were “unacceptable ve and“ Investment first ”, before the interruptions were implemented, for people to access mental health professionals or their work.

In the meantime, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) warned that Rachel Reeves will be forced to raise taxes or reduce other expenditures to reach their imposed borrowing rules.

The senior economist Ben Caswell said: “More thought -out policy, especially consumer and commercial confidence, can help reduce political complexity and associated economic costs.”

However, the Scottish workers’ leader Anas Sarwar was optimistic that the welfare bill would look different from Tuesday’s vote, because one -third of the Scottish workers supported the rebellion change.

Mr. Sarwar told Podcasts to Holyrood sources: “The draft will not appear the same … Legitimate concerns should be discussed. We must support the principle of reform.”

However, during a speech on Thursday, Badenoch claimed that Tories would go further than labor and promised to reduce £ 9 billion from the welfare bill.

Authorized, focusing on those with “really violent conditions” will allow the government to save money, saying, “What conditions should be entitled to long -term financial support,” he called for a basic rethink. ”

Burşüm This is where we need to focus on our efforts, ”he said. “I know it will not be easy. In fact, things will worse before it becomes better.”

In the early hours of Thursday, Trade Minister Douglas Alexander claimed that both ministers and rebels need to reform the prosperity and that the system is broken ”and the dispute was on the“ application to these principles ”.

When asked for concessions, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner tried to secure Backbencher that they would not be expected to betray Labour’s traditional values.

“I haven’t changed my labor values ​​and we don’t expect our banks to do anything that doesn’t control them,” he said in an interview with ITV Peston Program.

“What we want to do is to support people, and this is very important around these reforms that the Labor Party is trying to succeed, and we are discussing this with our MPs.”