Jury rules Meta violated law in period-tracking app data case

A California jury decided against Meta In a case of confidentiality allegedly collected from FLO, a period of monitoring, is collected.

The jury decided that the plaintiffs proved that Meta had violated the California Privacy invasion law, according to a decision form. filed On Friday, the US Northern Region California Regional Court.

The government stems from a class case based on 2021 against other businesses such as health technology company Flo Health and Meta, Google-Ebeveyn. Alphabet And smaller data analysis companies.

Flo Health, users, “Sensitive Reproduction Health Information” and survey questions will not be announced, but personal data, software development kits known as online advertising -related tools through companies such as meta and Google, he said. court filing.

Google and one of the analytical companies agreed to solve their allegations before a jury trial that began in July, while Flo Health chose to take the case to court and lose the case the day before the hearing on August 1st. The social media company is expected to object to the decision.

“This decision sends a clear message about the protection of digital health data and the responsibilities of big technology.” He said. expression. “Companies that make confidential profits from the most sincere information of users such as Meta should be held responsible.”

A commodity spokesman said the company did not participate in the decision.

“The plaintiffs’ claims against Meta are simply wrong,” meta spokesman said in a statement. He said. “The user privacy is important for meta, so we don’t want health or other sensitive information, and it prohibits why our terms are referred to any of the developers.”

WRISTWATCH: Jim Cramer Big Technology Gains.