Donald Trump news: Supreme Court limits judge power, Trump’s birthright citizenship restrictions in limbo

The Supreme Court of the United States decided that individual federal judges did not have the authority to give precautionary measures throughout the country – but the decision has left the fate of US President Donald Trump’s restrictions on citizenship of birth.
Since Trump acts in a legal struggle according to the proposal of limiting the citizenship of birth and ordered the sub -courts that prevent politics to rethink the scope of his orders, he reduces the power of judges by restricting the ability to give extensive legal relief in cases.
However, the court’s 6-3 decision, written by the conservative justice Amy Coney Barrett, did not allow Mr. Trump’s policy to enter into force immediately and did not mention the legality of policy.
Justice, Mr. Trump’s administration, Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington states organized by the federal judges and challenged the policy -defitment of the lawsuits of the scope of the scope of the scope of precautionary measures throughout the three countries.
With the court’s majority conservatives and advancing opposition, the decision said that Mr. Trump’s executive order could not enter into force 30 days after Friday’s decision.
“Nobody objected to the fact that the executive has the duty to follow the law. However, the judiciary has no authority to implement this obligation – in fact the law prohibits the judiciary from doing so,” he wrote.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, In A Dissed Joined by the Court’s OTher Two Progresive Members, Wrote, “The Majority ignores Enretily Wheet, the Presecutive Ordent’s Exstitations, Intead Focusing Only Only Only Courtes HAVE THE EQUITABLE TOSSUE Universal Injunctions.
Mr. Trump welcomed the decision on a social media post.
“The giant win at the US Supreme Court, Tr Trump wrote on the real Social.
On the first day of the task, Mr. Trump signed a executive order that directed federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the USA and was named as a “green card” owner who is a US citizen or at least one who does not have at least one parent who resides legally.
According to the plaintiffs who challenged him, including democratic lawyers of the state and immigrant rights defenders and pregnant immigrants, more than 150,000 newborns would be rejected, according to the directive of Mr. Trump.
The case before the Supreme Court asked the administration to claim that the Federal judges deprived of the authority to make “universal” violations and ruled from justice in this way and to apply the directive of the President without weighing their legal values.
In his opposition, Sotomayor said Mr. Trump’s executive order was contrary to the constitution.
Therefore, instead of defending the principles of the Ministry of Justice, he wrote, “No matter how illegal law or policy, the courts cannot tell the administrator to stop the implementation against anyone”.
Sotomayor wrote, “The games in this demand are evident and the government does not try to conceal it, Sot Sotomayor wrote.
“Nevertheless, embarrassing, this court plays together.”
Citizenship of the Right of Doğuş automatically makes everyone born in the United States as a US citizen, including children born illegally from mothers in the country.
In the 14th change of the Constitution, the right was covered shortly after the civil war.
With AP