Information that led to Afghan superinjunction being lifted was available last year, MoD admits

The government, the information that led to the removal of the Afghan data leakage was available last year, the government asked questions about why the unprecedented Gaging order was protected for so long.

The great leak in February 2022 revealed the personal information of 18,700 Afghan, looking for shelters in England, and an unseen court order that prohibited any details that the leak would fall into the hands of the Taliban and that it would be up to 100,000 people at risk.

Finally, on Tuesday, an investigation by the defense secretary John Healey, who ended in June, was removed after finding that the threat of danger was not important for the people on the list.

Now, it has been revealed that defense intelligence officials who advised the government about the need for Superinjunction could access the same information last year.

In a written response to the demands of the Supreme Court judge about why the order could not be abolished earlier, a senior government official admitted that the examination ordered by the defense secretary was already known by the Ministry of Defense.

Defense official Dominic Wilson said that the significant review of the response to the data violation is “based on the information found in a previous stage and evaluated by defense intelligence”.

The maintenance of Superinjunction, which has been in force for about two years, was based on the evaluations of defense intelligence officials who argued that thousands of life would be under the risk of death if it was reported to a large extent.

However, the government’s review of the former Defense Intelligence Director Paul Rimmer, in addition to the other targets of former Afghan officials, as well as murders without judicial murders, “It does not seem likely to be in the data set”.

“If the Taliban wants to target individuals, the wealth of data that was formerly inherited [Afghan] The government would already allow them to do this. Konuş

After receiving a copy of Mr. Rimmer’s review, the judge heard the case, Adalet Chamberlain, “Mode, the ultimately listened to the risk of the risk of the risk of the risk of the relevant information mode may have been reached,” he said.

The judge was concerned that the government could reach a much further opinion on the risks mentioned in the Rimmer examination and could decide to take a precautionary measure.

On Tuesday, the removal of the order, Justice Chamberlain said that the results of the examination “basically weaken the foundation of the evidence” and trust the precautionary measure and the decision to keep it in place.

The latest downstream street spokesman, who answered the revelation, said questions about why Superinjunction was not abolished earlier.

On Wednesday, Sir Keir expressed his anger over Starmer covering and said that the ministers of Tor were “serious questions to answer”.

Meanwhile, the Commons Defense Committee promised to enter the bottom of what was wrong with such disasters and launched an investigation into violation.

And Dame Chi Onwurah, President of the Committee of Joint Science Innovation and Technology, said he would write to the information commissioner for an investigation.

Although he has given a fine of £ 305,000 for a much smaller mod for a much smaller mod data violation, he wants to rethink a rethinking why he has refused to hold his own probe so far.