UK

Trump’s inner circle shifted view to support limited, one-off strike on Iran nuclear sites | Trump administration

Donald Trump’s three nuclear bombing movements in Iran shifted his views in favor of a one -time strike, as those who opposed the US intervention in the conflict.

The US president was under great pressure from Republican anti-Muslimists to avoid taking any action against Iran, except that the US President could lead to a long-term participation to overthrow Iran, or that strikes on facilities may have a limited success.

Some consultants inside and outside the White House tried to deterrent to what they characterized as a conflict initiated by Israel. Initially, they suggested that the US could continue to help Israel with the support of the intelligence community.

In recent days, however, Trump has increasingly thought of the possibility of strikes and said that the consultants had nothing to do with a long war to make a regime change, some consultants suggested that the US could do a rapid bombing run if Israel could not do anything more.

The developing landscapes made some overlap to order Trump for a bombing run aiming at three nuclear facilities in Iran. A US official said on Saturday that the strikes were completed, the B-2 bombing aircraft used in the raid came out of the Iranian airspace and other follow-up attacks were not planned.

However, strikes will inevitably be seen as a victory for the Hardliners in the United States, which pushes a challenging stance to Iran by some, a solid support of Israel’s attack on the country and the US military participation in this effort.

In the end, US strikes were limited to the nuclear uranium-grooming areas in Iran’s Natanz and Fordow, the facility was buried in the most difficult depth, and Iran is a third field in Isfahan, which is believed to hide the uranium of the close weapon.

It was unclear whether the bombing run has sufficient damage to reclaim Iran’s ability to acquire nuclear weapons, and as some officials suggested, it was unclear whether Iran’s weapon -class Uranium Uranium was removed from the Isfahan laboratory.

Despite the condemnation of the US military action in the Middle East, Trump saw the bombing run as comparable with the drone strike for the assassination of Iran, one of the most proud achievements from the early period.

As after the Sulimani operation, Trump released a giant graph of the American flag shortly after describing the bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities as “very successful” in an article explaining the details of the operation.

The comparison seemed to be an additional effort to underline that Iran did not want a wider war with Iran and focused on the steps that Iran focused on the necessary steps to ensure that I could not develop a nuclear weapon.

It may depend on how Iran interprets strikes and ability to retaliate. If the Iranian leaders perceive them as limited, they can lead to a more measured response. However, if it was seen as very disproportionate and there are very little to lose, Iran could open preliminary attacks on numerous US bases in the region.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button