Starmer’s welfare U-turn is short term gain for long term pain
SIr Keir Starmer was looking at a long weekend barrel on the phone that begged to walk around before Tueday’s crisis vote.
For some of the most challenging components, the Prime Minister hoped to get rid of a rebellion from Backbench deputies on their plans to significantly make life difficult.
For this reason, the leading rebel Dame Meg Hillier will be relieved of the welfare bill, except that the welfare bill, on Tuesday’s Vote on Tuesday.
Despite the late concession, the Prime Minister’s U -turn problem did not solve the problems, but hid them for another day.
Although he will now avoid the embarrassing view of a prime minister who lost a significant vote only a year after winning the 174 -seat majority, his serpin will quietly break down his authority.
First, he encouraged his backbencher. Especially among the new purchasing deputies, there was a reluctance of the labor leader for fear of being blacklisted from government affairs in the future, and even with fear of withdrawal.
The effect of PM’s benefit cuts would have such a destructive effect on people with disabilities, whom they thought that many of them could not keep their tongue.
Now, they learned that a public rebellion could go a long way to gain the attention of the Prime Minister after months of comprehension that he was not busy with with his deputies and concerns.
Second, it makes the prime minister look weak. U -turn, winter fuel payments and Labour’s previous climbing on the Green Investment Plan of 28 billion pounds followed the same pattern.
In the winter fuel, voters told voters that he was right to issue the payments of millions of retirees, that he made “difficult decisions ve and would not retreat.
Even if a U -turn seemed inevitable, Sir Keir stuck to his weapons and proceeded with a decision.
Later, after evacuating any political capital or honor that may have been gained from a privilege to retirees, he misrepresent the ration and refused to admit that he made wrong decisions in the first place.
It will be the same for benefit interruptions. Within a month, Sir Keir’s third U -eur from the voters weakens him in the eyes of the voters, and Nigel Farage is set to Pounce’s third U -Dönüşü.
The reform British leader has already tried to show the prime minister as lack of ideas and conviction and presented the rebellious right -wing party as a powerful alternative government to wait.
Sir Keir, directed by the Chief of General Staff Morgan Mcsweeney, aims to resist the increasing threat of reform. Hundreds of thousands of people to prosper and return to work, the benefit of the benefit of the other was another policies.
However, after returning from the majority of the policy, Sir Keir will once again leave a Farage-lite Labor Party when they can vote for the real one once again.
Thirdly, the prime minister’s last Uotic approach to the last U -turn means that he had anger with anger with anger with anger against his “unfamiliar expenditure commitments”.
The only option will have to be filled in a way and the only option is other places or more tax increase interruptions.
Maintenance Minister Stephen Kinnock was the first minister to defend the policy change and refused to say how to pay. The worker will now encounter questions and speculation for months and months, and exactly which taxes will pay for the U -turn of the taxes and will remove most of the rest of the party’s agenda from the rail.
And finally, U -turn solved a short -term problem, but potentially caused a larger long -term problem.
Campaigns warned that changes have created a two -layer system for personal independence payment (PIP) plaintiffs, and those who have started future claims are currently treated differently than those in the PIP.
Sir Keir often criticized conservatives for calling gypsum gypsum politics ”. However, while fighting with the greatest rebellion so far, the prime minister placed a plaster that sticks only on a large crack and is just a matter of time before he was taken back.
