What Labor’s climate and AUKUS decisions prove about Australia

In two of the most important issues faced by Australia, the Albanian government or a deep cynical form of politics-beyond the bottom of the bottomless standards of the public life of the nation, and a policy that sabotages itself in the form of paralysis.

First, the government in the climate crisis in which Australia talked about reducing local emissions while increasing almost fossil fuel exports 80% of our C0² footprint. Confirmation of Labor Extension of WoodSide’s North West Shelf Project It was the last of the 31 fossil fuel project last week The party approved Since the 2022 election win, which is expected to produce 6.5 billion tons of CO²-Equivalent emissions during their life.

While the worker subsidizes this exports, companies that benefit from them pay minimum tax. Despite the government’s “reforms” in oil resource rental taxes ( this year It will earn less income than the Howard government from PRRT He did it at 2005-06Although it has more gas exports Four since then.

Even carbon reduction policies of the Labor Party consist of renewable energy that is subsidized by taxpayer, a protection mechanism for large pollutants who can avoid regulatory ossification and disreputable Australian Carbon Credit Units (Accus). The government’s approval of the North -West Shelf extension, the project comes with a net zero in operational emissions by 2050, or a “necessity ği that WoodSide can buy Accus.

Certainly, while preparing the ground for the target to reduce the 2035 emissions and talking about “renewable energy superpower ,, the government continues our position as one of the world’s fossil fuel energy super powers – Number fourth in a list This has some of the worst -tempered state actors in the world.

The worker offers only the performer, slogan -based climatic action. The only difference of the coalition is that Parliament is a consensus supported by climate denial trade unions in Parliament. CFMEU and AWUTo support the approach of “not words, not the title deed”. The North West Shelf extension doubles this policy even more.

Commitment 12 billion dollars Henderson should be seen in the same light to the Henderson defense zone in Pert. Most of the financing of the government “Strategic ship maker“, scandal Austtal represents a big win for the labor -linked lobby company CMAX And former Defense Minister Joel Fitzgibbon, who has been representing Austtal since July, is “Special Advisor”.

However, if Trump decides to increase Australia’s defense expenditures and follow one of the USA or to lose Aukus, he also deals with the request of commitment to war with China. Henderson-Austhal committed both boxes: Henderson will be a place for Australia’s “sovereign” shipbuilding ability, but it will function as an additional care facility for the operations against China for the US nuclear submarines.

Indeed, the Labor Party, Henderson’s “sovereign an Australian facility and which Defense Minister Richard Marles It was clearly searched A “AUKUS FACILITY”:

Henderson Defense Zone will be the place where we maintain and maintain our future nuclear powerful submarines. And at the same time there will be the place where we build a naval ship in the West… And in this sense, this is a very dominant ability of Australia and this is its purpose. However, in relation to the maintenance of submarines, it is a AUKUS plant.

This doubles in the elimination of sovereignty, which is the distinctive feature of the Albanian government. Paul Keating’s explanation of Australia’s orbit more than a year ago is now more accurate than ever:

The power and scale of the US foundation in Australia will be kept in Australia’s own military talent in such a way that Australia’s Hawaii in the United States, Alaska, and more limited in GUAM, to be seen as the continent extension of its favorite American power. Such a conclusion is likely to turn the Australian government into a national ruler that it can be seen as a large -scale US protector in Asia in terms of defense and security.

Henderson’s decision, in response to Trump’s bullying, committed that Australian sovereignty would be subject to the United States as a national project or II. It is less important than the fact that it has not been consistently thinking about the greatest change in our strategic conditions since World War II.

In both cases, the government refers to the public debate. If there is a communication strategy for the “Donald J with Donald J program, the Murdoch Press and the coalition allow Washington to condemn labor because it does not have a strong enough relationship with Washington, while all our defense devices and geography are delivered as tools of US policy.

That is,, as in the climate, it doubles a policy response to large global challenges, while it creates a contrast between words and actions.

Both of these decisions are related to Western Australia. The long -deemed WA is a decayed media company, a decayed media company, a malignant petrostat that sends great balanced policy to its seats until May 3.

However, the fact that Labour could not clearly think about the problem of being a fossil fuel -dependent US protection in the world of US imperial decline and a global heating crisis, even if there was no single seat from the West.