SC Stays Trial Against Srilakshmi

Haydarabad: Senior IAS officer Y. Srilakshmi’yi helping, Friday, the Supreme Court, the high -profile Obulapuram mining scams continued to face the trial. A bench consisting of Justice MM Sundersh and Justice NK Singh thought about the claim of staying in the orders of the TaLangana Supreme Court, who recently rejected the request to discharge him from the case.

HC Namitha Stops the Work of 360 Life Project

Hyderabad: The Supreme Court of TaLangana has all other construction activities in Namitha 360 Life in the 25 -storey apartment of Shreemukh Namitha Homes PVT LTD, which is foreseen as the first vertical forest offices of India.

One of the shareholders of the project approached the court and objected to the permission of the GHMC to continue construction, despite the fact that he found about 18 deficiencies.

K. Patient’s Advisor K. Practical Reddy claimed that GHMC was directed to stop further construction in June in May 2025 to stop further construction in May 2025, contrary to the plan from the fire department and India’s airports, additional cellar and construction authority.

GHMC, on the instructions, during the delivery of the occupancy certificate, if not corrected, on the grounds that he would get objections to the deficiencies, he opposed any temporary order.

Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy made a strong objection to GHMC’s presentation because it allowed this unauthorized construction to continue. The court asked why the deficiencies that led to the stopping of the construction in May even refer to in the restructuring letter of June. As a result, the Supreme Court immediately entered into force and remained in construction and postponed the issue for more hearing on September 1.

HC Cleans the Egg tenders, the funded `1 l

Hyderabad: The Supreme Court of TaLangana reserved the floating tenders by the government to supply eggs to the Anganwadi centers and educational institutions carried out by the state in Haydarabad and rejected a petition trying to stop the process. The court also filed a penalty for 1 Lakh for the petition for trying to prevent the tender procedures.

In addition to the Anganwadi centers, the government recently published instructions for the purchase of eggs through the tender, excluding the mid-day meal plan for all Gurukuls, KGBVs and pensions. As the president, Haydarabad Regional Collector entrusted the responsibility of the Regional Purchasing Committee (DPC), which includes officials from education, welfare and officials from women and children’s departments. The procurement period is fixed from 1 September 2024 to August 31, 2025.

The Siri farms of Ibrahimpatnam in the Rangavedy region approached the court and challenged the tender for poultry and feed. The petition owner argued that the collector concluded the tender without considering the objections submitted on August 12 and called the Constitution of Natural Justice and the violation of Article 21.

By resisting these arguments, the unofficial participant lawyer claimed that the tender process was absolutely carried out in accordance with the rules.

Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka refused to defend by observing that the petition aimed to stop the supply process. The court not only supported the tender, but also slapped the petition for the petition for preventing the trouble -free behavior of state welfare programs.

Pandal Row turns out to be a woman’s conflict with the grandchildren

Haydarabad: On Friday, Justice Nv Shravan Kumar of the Supreme Court of TaLangana closed the case against a Ganesh pandal in the city against the police and GHMC. The judge ordered a petition to a petition at the same time in a linked writing opened by his lathe.

The Ganesh Pandal in Mes Colony in Marredpally was a dispute between a grandmother and a grandchild, literally on both sides of the mandat. The grandmother complained that Bala Ganesh and Friends Association had previously raised an unauthorized pandal and that the same thing not only creates traffic congestion in the area, but also affected the entry and exit of the house.

Justice Shravan Kumar, who entertained the petition, directed the police to complain in the file and to correct the complaint. The next day he carried a despise petition and said that even after the writing order, the authorities could not take action.

Torun Dayand Kalyan carried the court to reopen the written petition. In addition, an independent writer who challenged the action of the police to threaten to pull the panda down.

On Friday, the consultant Meghana Addla Suneel discussed other aspects of the issue, but Idol joined the fact that it would be fair to not disturb the idol at this stage, since it was already blessed.

L. Ravichander, a senior advisor for Dayanand Kalyan, said that the old petition in the previous petition came to court with dirty hands and could not explain his relationship with the person who raised the panda and raised the idol. He also placed a map in the court to show that he was entry and exit to the lady’s residence.

Based on the privilege, the case of contempt was closed. When the senior lawyer pointed out that bigger problems should be tried, and therefore the written petition was kept in the file. In his petition, the second author ordered the notification of the judge.