google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

How could Andy Burnham look to cut Britain’s soaring energy bills?

Andy Burnham is expected to take over as Britain’s new prime minister in the coming weeks, following his victory in the Makerfield by-election last month. While he has spoken of plans to change Britain for the better, promising “good growth in every postcode and hope in every heart”, the political landscape that awaits him will not be easy to navigate.

Public finances are tight, Labor is falling behind in the polls, people are increasingly disillusioned with mainstream parties and the cost of living crisis is hurting.

One of the things Mr Burnham will need to get under control when he takes office – just a few weeks before temperatures start to drop as we head into Autumn and Winter – will be rising energy costs. The war in Iran has caused prices to rise steadily, and the public has limited options due to limited funds in the budget.

Here, Independent It takes a look at some of the options available to the new MP for Makerfield.

Andy Burnham is expected to be Britain's new prime minister
Andy Burnham is expected to be Britain’s new prime minister (Reuters)

North Sea drilling

There have long been calls for North Sea drilling to be accelerated at a time of growing energy price concerns, with many arguing it would cut utility bills. But increasing North Sea drilling alone will not achieve this. Rather than being discounted to British consumers, oil and gas are sold by private companies at prices set by the international market. Yet Labour’s political opponents are still campaigning for it.

Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch laid out a plan to “get Britain drilling” by opening new oil and gas fields in the North Sea earlier this year. He claimed that increasing tax revenue from oil and gas extraction, as well as removing VAT on bills and some minor adjustments, would cut households’ energy bills by £200.

While this is something Mr Burnham might consider, research published last month by Oxford University’s Smith School found that households would see their bills fall by only around £16 a year if North Sea drilling was maximized, tax revenue redistributed and windfall taxes on energy companies removed.

Policy costs

One of the ways Andy Burnham could reduce energy bills would be to transfer so-called “policy costs” from people’s energy bills. These are the costs associated with the transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy. The money used to fund these initiatives was initially passed on to consumers through energy bills, but earlier this year – as part of a bid to cut spiraling bills by around £150 per household – the government shifted some of these costs from energy bills and into general taxation; this is generally seen as a more progressive way to pay for it.

However, some of these costs still remain. If households want to feel some immediate relief on their energy bills, shifting more of those costs from bills to overall taxation would be one way to do it.

Energy bills are increasing due to the war in the Middle East
Energy bills are increasing due to the war in the Middle East (P.A.)

clean power

This is one of the key priorities of Sir Keir Starmer’s government. Investing in cheaper, homegrown energy sources such as wind and solar power will minimize costs for households and reduce dependence on the volatile fossil fuel market, which is so harshly affected by geopolitical events.

But this won’t cut the bills overnight. The government currently targets 95 percent clean energy by 2030; This means it will take at least three years for a significant reduction in bills to be felt.

Improvement in the geopolitical landscape

Sir Keir Starmer felt the economic shock of war in the Middle East; energy bills increased and inflation soared. But if luck is on Mr Burnham’s side, energy bills could fall with minimal intervention if a permanent peace deal is signed in the Middle East.

A less volatile landscape in the region will allow bills to continue falling and inflation to return, as the likelihood of supply disruptions and physical damage to energy infrastructure will be reduced.

But Cabinet Secretary Darren Jones revealed earlier this year that the government predicted price rises as a result of the Iran war would be felt for at least eight months after the conflict ends; This means that it is not possible to feel any reduction in bills immediately.

The prime minister’s chief secretary warned that people would see increases in energy, food and flight prices for more than six months after the end of the war “as a result of what Donald Trump has done in the Middle East” and said there would be “a long tail coming out of this”.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button