Thanks, Supreme Court! It’s now my right to prevent my kid from learning about Trump.
A divine rule, lying, bullying and Adult pays $ 130,000 to a movie star pays for a movie star They are all immoral actions.
So thank you so much US Supreme Court and the final decision allowing Maryland parents To choose their children from courses containing the LGBTQ+ material I have announced: Donald TrumpIt brings an unlawful burden on the right to first amendment for my right to use my religion freely, including the unfortunate truth that it is the US president.
In the 27th June DecisionThe Supreme Court stated to Wisconsin / Youth and acknowledged that “the court may have the right to ‘the right to direct the religious upbringing of their children’ and that this right could violate the ‘laws that pose a very real threat to weaken the religious beliefs and practices that parents want to instill to their children’.
Supreme Court Shows that I can fight to prevent children from getting information about Trump
Well, I would like to instill your belief in my children some Americans “Radical Left bandits living like vermis” and Definition of the United States as Vice President of the United States “Mentally disabled” and “a weak and stupid woman” are bad things worthy of anyone, less chief commander.
LGBTQ+ Rights supporters, justice, showed verbal arguments in the Mahmoud / Taylor case on April 22, 2025, except for the Supreme Court.
Therefore, any attempt to teach my children to teach my children that Trump exists and that the president is acceptable, that will violate my right to raise my children under the moral principles of my faith. (My faith, in this case, there is a relatively simple belief that almost always being a complete filth is bad.)
Idea: I can’t wait to get a Trump Mobile Gold Phone to respect the King of Maga
Alito clearly does not want to teach schools that Trump exists
Like Justice Samuel Alito wrote in his opinion Regarding the use of LGBTQ+ books in schools, some Americans want to offer a different moral message to their children. And on the contrary, the message weakens the message when it is positively strengthened at a very young age. “
Definitely. I want to present a moral message to my children When a man is responsible for sexual abuse And He heard what they said things Im I acted like a bitch to him ”and“ Now he has big fake breasts and everything ”and“ caught by the cat ”, this man is considered disgusting by civil society and does not vote for the presidential office.
This wish is weakened by any book or teacher who exposed my student to the fact that Trump is the president.
The Supreme Court protects children from the persecution of love
In the New York City’s Criminal Court on January 10, 2025, President Seçkin Donald Trump means that judge Juan Michan Trump is “unconditional discharge”, but his conviction is based on 34 guilty business records to cover the payment of Porn Stormy Daniels.
Alito talked about a few books in Maryland schoolsMira Mira, who fell in love with her female classmate, including a young girl named Violet Violet, is in love with her female classmate, Violet’s’ Heart Jump ‘and’ Thunde[r] Like a hundred gallop. ‘Violet is initially afraid to interact with Mira, but two are exchanging gifts on Valentine’s Day. Later, it is seen that the two girls hold hand in hand and ran to gallop on profitable drifts to see what they can find. Together.'”
My religion describes such a story as “sweet” and “loving ,, while alito and its conservatives The Supreme Court finds this “hostile” to the religious beliefs of the parents..
Tell us: Is America’s billionaire explosion good for the government or democracy? | Idea Forum
As Alito wrote“Like many books aiming at young children, books are clearly normative. Certain values and beliefs are clearly designed to offer certain opposite values and beliefs as things to be celebrated and things to be rejected.”
OK. With the same logic, any class discussion or history lesson, which contains the status of Trump and president, has the potential to teach my children that it is normal to have my children. president who lies uninterrupted– Demens transsexual people And Routine demonizes immigrants.
Opinion Warnings: Get columns from your favorite columnists from your columnist analysis, in the best problems, it is delivered directly to your device through the US Today’s application. Don’t you have an application? Download for free from your application store.
“Certain values and beliefs are clearly designed to present as things to be rejected,” Trump’s acceptance of any class, such as the President, “certain values and beliefs, and some, and some values and beliefs.”
Now I will appeal to any book or class word of Donald Trump
A school financed by the taxpayer, I will not stand idle while my children have a moral character to become the president of Trump’s United States, as well as a fraudulent and rude person. My belief led me to teach them otherwise, and any suggestion that Trump’s behavior was acceptable would weaken this belief.
Idea: As a teacher, the Supreme Court is dealing with the religious freedom of the parents.
ELY Brinkley, a personnel lawyer for the US, free expression programs in Free Speech Defense Group Pen America, He said in a statement Following the decision of the Supreme Court in the Maryland case: “The decision will allow any parent to object to any subject that has the potential to influence chaos bread and students, parents, educators, writers and publishers in schools.”
Amen. I object to Donald Trump. Let the chaos appear.
Follow Rex Huppke, Usa Today columnist in Bluesky @rexhuppke.bsky.social And on Facebook facebook.com/rexajerk
You can read various opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other authors. Idea front pageIn X, old twitter, @usatodyopinion And ours Intellectual Bulletin.
This article was initially published on the Usa Today: Supreme Court saved children from reading about Trump | Idea
