The lesson of Starmer’s shake-up is: Rachel is toast. ANDREW PIERCE on why the Chancellor’s future looks grim

Keir Starmer was badly wrong if the shaking of the downward street operation would give him a new atmosphere of strategic competence.

Until Sunday, Downing Street was reported to insist on any plan for a change in ‘Ice’.

Yesterday morning, in the sign of confusion and chaos defining this administration, expelled and promotions began in accordance with the duly.

After the summer holiday, some members of the cabinet, which was on the first days of Westminster, not only realized what happened thanks to social media.

A minister gave me last night: ‘When I saw it on Twitter first I know.’

There are two basic lessons to be learned from yesterday’s activities.

The first is that Starmer appoints his own economic experts at the expense of Chancellor Rachel Reeves – he’s definitely sick for him.

Secondly, it has been clearly convinced that it has a problem with ‘commS’ – that is, the government’s message – rather than managing.

According to Andrew Pierce, workers’ deputies were surprised by the appointment of Darren Jones (yesterday).

Keir Starmer speaks to Darren Jones after appointed as the Chief Secretary of the Prime Minister on Monday

Reeves, on July 7, it is understood that Starmer shed with a tears next to him.

As for the fate of the chancellor, a minister gave him a short time when I asked him what he meant: ‘Oh, simple. Rachel F *** ed. ‘

The most radical change Darren Jones, the secretary and the Treasury role of the Prime Minister’s new position has passed.

This panic and very little curiosity aroused: a survey conducted on Friday led Nigel Farage’s reform to England by 15 percent on labor.

Readers may remember Jones as the man who shocked the liberal viewers of the questioning a few months ago: ‘The majority of people who pass the channel on small boats are children, babies and women.’

(In fact, adult men made 73 percent of arrival between 2018 and 2025.)

The workers’ deputies were amazed by the appointment. Jones has never been close to Starmer, and in his latest role, he chaired a brutal public expenditure that requires almost every department to spend a 15 percent ax compared to this parliament.

A source told me: ‘Darren is the most popular member of the cabinet due to the way the examination is carried out.

‘The appointment cannot be explained and another wrong step.’

Jones with Reeves except 11 Downing Street in October last year

Chancellor laly teleported with a red budget box last year

The second major change came from his dismissal director as a communication director just five months after he experienced the same fate after his predecessor Matthew Doyle, an experienced newspaper journalist.

Starmer has now launched four ‘CommS Director’ in five years.

Instead of Lyons, Tim Allan, who was once a key advisor to Tony Blair, which was once called the executive director of the government.

Allan will work with Steph Driver, who is another communication director and has been with PM since they are in opposition.

A source told me that Allan would be responsible, but warned that his appointment suggested increasing helplessness.

“The Blair period is the political light years away,” the source said. ‘Will they bring Gordon Brown back to advise the budget?’

This brings me to economic issues. Last month, leading economists warned that Britain went to a debt crisis of the 1970s and to save the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Many workers’ deputies expect Reeves to sharpen taxes in the next month’s budget, which is more likely to further deteriorate the terrible survey scores of the Labor Party.

In a sign that Starmer knew that the country is in a financial orbit with vast, it brought its own personal economy guru for the first time: the former governor of the Bank of England Barones Shafik.

Reeves, Monday with Economic Advisor Professor John Van Reenen

The change of James Lyons (in the picture) is Tim Allan, the lock consultant of Tony Blair, who was once called the communication manager of the government.

Anyone who hopes to make a change from socialist style taxes and expenditures will be disappointed: An academic Minauche Shafik has discussed for the reserve taxes and for the abolition of the inheritance tax relief in farms that cause anger in rural communities.

Meanwhile, Daniel York-Smith, one of Reeves’ most reliable tax experts, was confirmed as the leading secretary of Starmer.

Another senior labor figure told me: ‘The first person used by the Prime Minister for economic advice was Rachel. Now he has his own economic advisor and York-Smith’s desk will be out of the Prime Minister’s work. Rachel will be the second or third violin. ‘

The lessons of history here are not good: when Margaret Thatcher brought Alan Walters as a personal economic advisor in 1989, Nigel Lawson, who Iron Lady described as ‘unbearable’, left a year.

But if he returns to the Chancellor of Starmer, this is not surprising.

The Treasury was accused by many of the last 12 months for the primary policy blunder of the last 12 months, from the winter fuel allowance fiasco to 4 billion pounds in disability aid blocked by workers’ deputies.

Some of this accusation certainly deserves.

Nevertheless, it is true that these policies are signed by Starmer (as PM, of course, the first master of the Treasury).

Starmer will undoubtedly pray that he will put his shaky premiere on a solid foundation at the end of yesterday’s maneuvers.

A labor source guaranteed me.

But even his own supporters question the timing.

One of the Prime Minister’s ally told me: ‘These changes should have been made in the first week of recess, so new people could sleep – and we could run to the ground on the first day of the new parliamentary session. Instead, everyone talks about another “reset” to try to reverse our terrible survey points.

And if I hear that one of our people said he was mixed in Titanik, I will scream. This is a terrible look. ‘