Tesla CEO Elon Musk is known safely Tesla will receive for many attempts such as X and SpaceX for expected developments.
Some of them, as an effort to push the goals that may be a new motivation, a new Sieve Editorial argued that some of these ambitious, unprecedented promises seemed to be an expression of optimism and more intentional deception.
On Thursday, Electrek’s editor -in -chief Fred Lambert published an article triggered by Musk’s change with Tesla investor and Musk Acollyte Sawyer Merritt.
Four days ago, Merritt tweeted A short clip from an interview with Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi. In the cropped segment, an interviewer asked Khosrowshahi that autonomous electric vehicles will come close.
In response to a question about whether Waymo’s multiple sensor approach would come out on top or whether Tesla’s “Camera Only” installation will reign, Khosrowshahi alone doubted that the cameras could bring “superhuman security levels”.
Musk answered He challenges Merritt to buy Khosrowshahi.
“Lidar and radar reduces security due to sensor strife.… This sensor uncertainty is reduced, causing an increase of risk, Mus Musk partly said.
The conversation caught Lambert’s eye and reminded him of a debate with Musk in 2021. Lambert had a problem that Musk characterized Lidar and radar sensors as “more dangerous” from Tesla’s “more dangerous” than the camera system.
“This is not just wrong, Musk said to me that the radar and vision can only be safer than the vision, just after Tesla’s radars from their vehicles.”
He added the screenshots of the conversation to support his claim.
“We’re at 2025 at the moment, and unlike Musk’s claim, Tesla has not yet fulfilled its own driving promises, but CEO only doubles its vision approach.”
In one of the screenshots in 2021, Musk admitted that “a very high resolution radar would be better than pure vision, but that such a radar is not present.”
Ultimately, Lambert observed a dominant theme in Musk’s claims: If Tesla cannot do anything, he cannot be done.
Currently, the United States government seems to have passed away against the homes, while peer nations, such as Norway, transition to a variable rate.
Better or worse, Tesla electric vehicle It is the mascot of the car manufacturer, which is extremely unpredictable and often abrasive musk functionally.
At this point, it is not easy to separate MISK from Tesla, and variable public perception continues to deter him drivers. Making your next cars home.
Lambert’s new change with Musk gave consumers another reason to doubt CEO’s motives, reality relationship and hypothetical disrespect for security.
An Electrek commentator, depicting Musk’s ability to add confidence, first argued that Tesla Head believed that consumers were “stupid” and could not understand security mechanisms or “layoffs” layers.
“If the planes are so safe, they have a lot of excess systems for everything. [about] Cost/benefit, so some people tell us that they are good dying. “
Musk and Tesla, contrary to some evidence in favor of Lidar and Radar, they really began to believe that they are unnecessary surpluses, but a part of Lambert is that the shadow of a suspicion may shake the bad optics and consumer trust – especially when it comes to such a new limit of technology and physical danger.
Despite Tesla’s ongoing and various problems and political winds, home sales have exceeded even Tesla’s expectations in 2025.
Tesla’s problematic year also made second -hand houses more suitable and the brand’s non -confident foundations increased the sales of competing electric vehicle brands.
Consumers may be Tesla, who predicted the second, but that’s why they didn’t cool to the homes.
Join Free bulletin for Good news And Useful tipsand don’t miss This is a wonderful list Easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
