The Shroud of Turin was not laid on Jesus’ body, scientists reveal
For centuries, religious Christians flocked to the city of Italian Turin to pay their respect to one of the most famous remains in the world.
Turin’s cover is a piece of linen that measures 14FT 5 inch x 3ft 7, which has a slight appearance of the front and back of a man.
Many believe that this image was created when Jesus was wrapped in the esteemed veil shortly after his death in the cross 2,000 years ago.
However, according to a new study, the cover of the tour of the tour of the tour was never thrown into Jesus’ body.
Brazilian 3D designer and researcher Cicero Moraes says that the cover of the ‘Christian art’s masterpiece’ is nothing more than the ‘masterpiece of the Christian art’.
Mr. Moraes used digital modeling software to examine how a body was covered on the human body compared to a low, straight statue of a body.
These results were published in the magazine this week ArchaeometryShow that the unique pattern of the cover can be produced by only one sculpture.
Moraes wrote in his article: ‘The image of the cover is more consistent with an artistic low relief representation rather than the direct trace of a real human body.’
The new analysis shows that the images in the Turin Cover (center) can be produced by placing the cloth on a flat sculpture (right), not from a human body (left).
To understand how the image of Turin could be created, Mr. Moraes created two digital 3D sculptures.
The first was a kind of flat sculpture known as a human body, and the second known as relaxation.
Using various 3D simulation tools, Mr. Moraes was measured on these two sculptures where digitally draped fabric and fabric touched the material.
Mr. Moraes then compared the images of the virtual fabric in 1931 with pictures taken from the Turin Cover.
This revealed that the fabric covered in the relief statue was the perfect match for the cover.
Meanwhile, the image created by covering the fabric on a real person was seen to be wide and distorted.
Mr. Moraes says this is due to something called ‘Agamemnon Mask Effect’, which is called the unusual wide death mask in a grave in Mycenae in Greece.
When you try to reflect a 3D surface like a piece of fabric, such as a human face, the result is extremely deteriorated.
Turin’s cover is a piece of linen that measures 14FT 5 inch x 3ft 7, which has a slight appearance of the front and back of a man. However, a study now says that the human body will not produce these signs.
This is because it is called ‘Agamemnon Mask Effect’, which is called for the unusual extensive death mask in a grave in Mycenae in Greece (painting). This effect means that a flat image taken from the 3D body will seem unnaturally distorted unlike the images on the cover of Turin.
Imagine that you cover your own face with paint and press the paper napkin.
The remaining image on the napkin does not look like a portrait, on the contrary, stretched and crooked.
Therefore, Mr. Moraes believes that the images on the cover of Turin cannot be produced by furnishing Jesus’ body.
Mr. Moraes said Live science: ‘The image on the cover of Turin is more consistent with the low relief matrix.
‘Such a matrix could produce the observed pattern only in contact areas, only in contact areas, with wooden, stone or metal – even heated.’
The first record of the tour of the tour of the tour of the tourism dates back to the 14th century, and the residue was almost accused of being almost fake.
Using radioactive carbon isotopes in 1989, modern carbon dating, a way to measure the age of natural materials, placed the creation of a cover between 1260 and 1390 AD.
This means that the linens in the cover still grow 1000 years after Jesus’ death, which makes the cover impossible to be a real residue.
Brazilian 3D designer and researcher Cicero Moraes compared how the fabric will cover on a flat sculpture known as a human body and a low relief. He found that a low relaxation would produce images that are a definite match for those on the cover.
This means that it is really a part of the medieval art rather than a remnant that captures Jesus’ face shortly after the death of the tour of the tour. Picture: AI Reconstruction of the face depicted by Turin’s cover
In this part of the Middle Ages, religious figures of religious figures were extremely popular decorations for structures such as low reliefs and tombstones.
According to Mr. Moraes, this makes it more likely to be created as a work of art during the medieval funeral practices and then to be accepted as a true remains.
Despite allegations that the old residue may be a scam, many of them still argue that Turin’s veil is really the burial of Jesus.
Last year, Professor Liberato de Caro, a determined Catholic and Deacon in his local church, claimed that there was ‘tremendous evidence’ to prove the legitimacy of the covers.
Professor De Caro’s latest analysis in 2022 claimed that the cover could return to the death of Jesus by using a new X-ray method.
However, the method used by the researchers was completely unreliable and was created by Professor De Caro to prove the veil.
Although its results have been widely published, Turin, an organization dedicated to prove the originality of the covers, called on people to pay attention to these results.
Similarly, an analysis published last year examined the samples taken using modern microscopy methods in 1978 using adhesive tape.
The cover first appeared in 1354 in France. Initially, after condemning fake, the Catholic Church embraced the cover as real. Pope Francis in the picture visits the cover of Turin in 2015
Scientists took small examples of the tour of the tour of the tour (left) and exposed the wide-angle X-ray radiation to create an image of the linen example used for dating (right). Although these methods dated the veil until 0 AD, the results were strongly criticized
In 1978, a previous study analyzed blood samples from the cover collected using adhesive tape. According to the study, this showed symptoms of blood, disease, trauma and radiation
This study conducted by an engineer from the University of Padua in Italy found small particles of blood showing signs of organ failure, trauma, illness and radiation.
When a person is exposed to muscle disintegration or some kind of trauma, creatine traces are also defined in the cover of the bloodstream.
However, judicial analysis has shown that the ‘blood stains in the cover are inconsistent with someone extending and can only be made by a standing figure.
This does not match the Bible account, where Jesus is wrapped up to the veil after being removed from the cross.
Likewise, scientists questioned whether the original cover of the blood was part of.
Dr. John Jay College is a judicial scientist who is a professor Emeritus. Lawrence Kobilinsky, Daily Mail ‘Blood’ was probably a ‘probably’ secondary thought ‘, he said.
Indeed, in 1978, American chemist who analyzed the band strips. Walter McCrone found that the image consists of red glaze and gelatin solution.
Dr Kobilinsky, ‘The simplest explanation, this cover is placed on a pigment -covered sculpture in certain areas transferred to the cloth and when you make the right type of photography when you give this three -dimensional configuration.
