Trial reveals flaws in tech intended to enforce Australian social media ban for under-16s | Social media

In order to check the age of a person and to prohibit the use of social media under 16 years of age, technology is not guaranteed to be effective ”and facial scanning tools gave false results, and accepts the operators of the Australian government.

Tested tools – some of them will be developed by verification of identity documents or connection with digital wallets, some of which are analyzing sounds and faces, and suggested the plan.

The trial also found that some technology providers are trying to gather a lot of personal information.

Since the “Preliminary findings” were explained to the public on Friday, the operators insisted that age security could work and maintain personal confidentiality.

The pre -findings did not detail the type of technology types or any data about the results or accuracy. Guardian Australia in May ACCS, only one hundred age estimation technology at that stage, he said.

One of the experts participating in the hearing admitted that there were restrictions and that there would be wrong results for both children and adults.

Guardian told Australia, “the best of the class until the figures of this experiment is published, the best declared estimation accuracy was for one and a month of the average age-so you need to design your approach with this restriction,” he said.

Project Director Tony Allen said that most of the programs are the accuracy of the age of “plus or minus 18 months” – which is not “flawless ,, but would help to reduce the risk.

The Albanian Federal government’s social media running to Parliament last year will enter into force in December.

The trial of the government’s age assurance systems is critical for the plan. Legislation does not clearly say how platforms should force the law, and the government evaluates more than 50 companies that can help a user over 16 years of age.

ABC Notified on Thursday In the experiment, young children were only 85% in choosing the age of a user in the 20s and 30s by some software and the age of a user in a 18 -month range of facial scanning technology. However, Allen said he would give more detailed data about the findings of the final report of the hearing and the accuracy of the tested technology.

The trial is carried out by the age control certificate plan and the test partner KJR. A report was presented to the government on the advance of the trial in June, but was postponed until the end of July. On Friday, the trial published a two -page summary of “pre -findings” and broad reflections before they told the new Minister of Communication Minister Anika Wells that the “hundreds of pages” would be the final report of the “hundreds of pages ..

The summary said that there are “careful, critical thinking by the providers” and “many options ında on confidentiality and security concerns. “Age assurance can be done in Australia” concluded.

The summary praised some approaches he said he said he had dealt with personal data and privacy. However, he also called the “evidence ğı that some providers are trying to collect too much data.

“Some providers were found to create tools to enable regulators, law enforcement or coronars to withdraw the actions they take to confirm the age of individuals, which may lead to an increase in confidentiality violations due to unnecessary and disproportionate gathering and retention of data.”

In the documents shared with the schools participating in the study, the program operators, in addition to other methods such as checking identity forms, as well as technologies such as Facial Analysis, Sound Analysis or Analysis of Hand Movements to estimate the age of a person, such as technologies such as AI -supported technology, he said.

The stakeholders expressed concerns about how children could get over the ban to help them to help them by deceiving the face of the face of the face or the older brothers or parents.

Friday’s pre -findings, various plans can comply with different situations and “the only common solution to all use situations” or any solution is not guaranteed in all distribution “is not guaranteed,” he said.

The report also stated that there are “Technological Improvement Opportunities ında, including facilitating and reduce risk in the systems tried.

This may include the verification of “blind” through services such as digital wallets of government documents.

Corby said that the hearing should “manage expectations içinde about the effectiveness of age security, saying that the hearing should be“ the aim should often stop non -disregard users ”.

“You can increase the activity, but this comes to the majority of adult users who need to prove more regularly than they will tolerate their age,” he said.

Corby said that the hearing is working on the risks of the children who survived systems, and that the providers are already well placed well to address the basic problems such as the use and fooling of VPNs.