Trump may end legal parole given to 532,000 migrants from four countries

Washington – President Trump may have recently decided to deport hundreds of thousands of immigrants to the United States under a two -year conditional evacuation grant, and the Supreme Court decided on Friday.

More than two oppositions, justice An urgent appeal was given and the judges in Boston put aside the decisions It prevented Trump’s conditional evacuation policy Biden was accepted by the administration.

This 2023 policy has opened the door for business authority if there is a financial sponsor for Cubans, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezüelis and can exceed background controls. When Biden left the office, 530,000 people from these countries entered the USA within the scope of the program.

Justice Ketanji Brown Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor opposition.

“The court has clearly seen this, Jacks Jackson wrote, adding that he should keep the case on waiting during the appeal.

On Friday, the unidentified order is not a final decision, but a strong sign that Trump’s order will be approved. If they thought that his decision was true, the majority would not remove the judge’s order.

Constitutional Security Secretary Ticia McLughlin described the decision as a victory for the Americans.

“Chnv will end the conditional evacuation programs and the parolies of those who exploit it, return to common sense policies, public security, and a return to America first,” he wrote.

For the second time in two weeks, Trump supported some immigrants to cancel the administration policy of a large -scale Biden giving temporary legal status.

The first canceled program gave a temporary protected status to approximately 350,000 Venezuelalı in this country.

The Parole policy allowed him to enter up to 30,000 immigrants from four countries with temporary legal protection. Biden officials saw this as a way to reduce illegal border crossings and to provide a safe and legal way for carefully scanned immigrants.

The long comprehensive policy was based on a modest provision of immigration laws. The internal security secretary, for any foreign emergency humanitarian reasons seeking acceptance, “temporarily to the United States … According to the situation, according to the situation,” he says.

Immigrant defenders, the decision on the affected communities will devastate and release the “common chaos”, he said.

Karen Tumlin, the founder and director of the Justice Action Center, said, “The Supreme Court gave an effective greening orders for half a million people, which is the greatest legalization in the modern age,”.

After taking office, Trump ordered to end the “all categorical conditional evacuation programs”. At the end of March, the Secretary of the Department of Department of Interpretation NOEM announced that the conditional evacuation protection will end within 30 days.

However, last month, the US Regional Judge Indira Talwani prevented the “categorical” termination of DHS’s conditional evacuation authority. The law said that the government could give the conditional evacuation “according to the situation ve and that it should be canceled according to the situation.

On May 5, the 1st Circuit Court in a 3-0 decision, adopted that the conditional evacuation “categorical termination” appeared illegal.

Three days later, lawyer Gen. D. John Sauer made another application. Urgent appeal in the High Court, Claiming that it has exceeded the authority of a judge.

The Parole authority is “completely optional ve in the hands of the DHS Secretary, and prevents the law from reviewing these decisions of judges.

Biden administration said that Boston -based judges prevented the new policy because it is “categorical”.

The judges accused the judges for the kaldırı the recovery of democraticly approved policies in the November elections, which were carefully calibrated to determine the illegal entry, revived the concessions of the nuclear executive branch and intensively involved in the November elections ”.

Immigrant rights defenders called the court to put aside.

Giving the objection of the administration “causes a tremendous amount of unnecessary human suffering” They told the court.

They said that the immigrants said that after each application was applied individually through a US financial sponsor, it still came to the United States with the permission of the federal government, after taking security and other checks abroad and taking permission to the government without any expense to request a conditional evacuation.

“Some class members have been here for about two years; others came in January,” he added.

In contrast, Sauer claimed that immigrants had no justification to complain. “They accepted a conditional evacuation that the benefit was temporary, optional and canceled at any time,” he said.

In the late 2022, the Biden administration began to offer temporary entrance to Venezueli, and then expanded the program to people from three other countries a few months later.

In October last year, Biden management does not offer renovation He led these immigrants to resort to other forms of relaxation such as asylum or temporary protected status.

It is not clear exactly how many people are only protected during the conditional evacuation status and now can be targeted for deportation. It is not clear whether the administration is trying to deport most or most of these immigrants.

Conditional evacuations that have recently tried to adjust their legal status hit a barricade.

In the February 14th noteUS citizenship and immigration services, Cubans, Haitians, Nicaragians and Venezuel people within the scope of the conditional evacuation program within the scope of the waiting benefit demands and a program for the Ukrainians and another family reuniture has announced an administrative attitude.

Note said that the federal agency should apply “additional veterinary flags” to determine fraud, public safety or national security concerns. However, on Wednesday, a federal judge in Massachusetts ordered Trump administration To remove waiting.

The DHS note said the government could extend the conditional release according to the situation for some. However, Trump’s lawyers said that immigrants, who were less than two years, could be deported without a hearing under the provisions of the “accelerated abolition of immigration laws.

Talia Inlerder, Deputy Director of Nigning Law and Policy Center, Faculty of Law Faculty, said that the government should not be allowed to undress people in legal status without sufficient reason or notification.

Program a Challenge from Texas In 2023, Trump said he expects rapid individual legal difficulties in accelerated lifting use.

“Many people’s life is on the line,” Inlender said. “These people did everything correctly – they applied through a legal program, they were examined. And to remove the carpet in this way, I think, I should attack our own opinion about what justice is in this country.”