Trump’s case for using troops to help ICE involves fugitive slave law

Although a federal judge reduces a sink on Thursday, the military forces in Los Angeles will be under presidential control during the weekend and will establish a series of high -betting demonstrations.

In the streets of Los Angeles, protesters will continue to meet the teams of armed soldiers. The state and local authorities continue to clash with the President. And in the courts, Trump management lawyers are digging into the case -law in search of archaic regulations that can refer to the ongoing federal pressures, including the constitutional maneuvers invented to implement the 1850 illegal slave action.

Many legal academics say that the current war on Los Angeles is a test case for the forces that the White House has hoped to use for a long time-not only protest or large-foot blue state leaders, but also extends the presidential authority to the legal limit.

“There is a lot about what will happen this weekend, Prof.

9. The Circuit Court of Appeal left the control of most soldiers until the weekend to give back to the leaders of California until the weekend, and on Saturday, thousands of national guards and hundreds of sailors in front of the “no king” protests and hundreds of sailors left the Trump administration.

In court, the Trump administration claimed that the ice agents had the authority to place troops in the court due to protesters who prevented the arrest and deportation of unauthorized immigrants and the demonstrations in the city center meant “rebellion against the authority of the US government”.

However, Charles Breyer, the US Regional Court from San Francisco, wrote on Thursday.

“His actions were illegal – both exceeding the scope of his legal authority and violating the tenth change in the US Constitution, BR said Breyer.

Even though he could not detain as many people as much as the defendants could have ”, Breyer was still able to support the US immigration law without the help of the army. Authorized, a few warriors between thousands of peaceful protesters, said that they did not rebel.

The judge wrote that the idea that protesters can pass the line between the protected behavior and the rebellion against the authority of the US government ‘can pass the line so quickly and dangerous.

9. The circuit was released for hours after the California leaders published a temporary limitation order that would allow La to withdraw national guard troops.

The pause will be in force at least until Tuesday, and two referee panels appointed by the President Trump and former President Biden will have discussions about whether the troops can be in the federal administration.

The court war benefited from the precedent who returned to the country’s establishment and presented the obvious opposite visions of the federal authority and the rights of the states.

When the President of the President was last federalized about the objections of a state governor, President Lyndon B. Johnson, Martin Luther King Jr. And when he sent him unit to protect Selma to Montgomery March to challenge the Gov at that time, it happened in 1965. George Wallace.

However, the inheritance said that sending troops to help Ice was less common to Johnson’s movement and President Millard Fillmore’s actions a century ago. Starting from 1850, Houston Legal Professor said Fillmore sent unity to accompany the federal Marshal who want to capture the escaping slaves who escaped north.

Inheritance, Trump’s allegations of placing the national guard and marine pads to support the efforts of federal immigration implementation of the Constitution II. He said that the article is based on the same principle taken from the “be careful” article. He said that the anger on the army’s repeated conflicts with civilians helped to stop the flames that led to the Civil War.

Most Most of the population opposed the active implementation of the Legal Slave Law, Prof said Professor.

Some analysts believe that Trump has chosen to advance the strategic migration, the so -called “unitary executive theory” version, he said that the Legislative Assembly has no power and that the judiciary has no right to intervene how the President’s executive branch use the control of the executive branch.

“It is not a coincidence that we see that migration is a glare point,” Professor Ming HSU Chen at UCSF Law Faculty said. “Someone who wanted to apply strong federal power over immigration would see La as an extremely symbolic place, zero to show their authorities.”

In the UCSF law, Chen, who chaired the race, migration, citizenship and equality program, said that this was clear and that his advisors were a vision of how ice can be encouraged ”.

“He puts this in steroids, Chen Chen. “ It brings together many different types of administrator power as if it were the same thing. ”

Some experts point out that Judge Breyer’s order is limited to California, which means that it can drag for weeks or months until it is sued – means that the President can try similar moves elsewhere.

“The President can try the same thing in another field of judiciary, Eliz said Elizabeth Goitein, Senior Director of the Freedom and National Security Program at the Brennan Justice Center of NYU.

Goitein said, “President Trump’s memorandum to deploy troops in Los Angeles made it very clear that it thinks it was appropriate… Where the protests took place”. “He definitely thinks that even peaceful protests can be forced to meet.”

Experts, Breyer’s decision, in accordance with the law for the “rebellion” to be considered to be a high rod, and the administration of the administration is more difficult to claim that a person standing even more difficult, he said.

“It is hard to imagine that everything we see at the weekend will be an organized, armed attempt to overthrow the government,” Goodin said.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration did not insist that excessive measures are necessary to restore order and protect federal agents while continuing their jobs.

In a news bulletin this week, a news bulletin, including the cups of several criminals in a news bulletin, “The rebels will not stop or slow the arrest of illegal foreigners.” He said. “Murderers, pedophiles and drug smugglers.

Even after the 9th circuit decision, the issue can still go to the High Court. Some legal scholars are afraid that Trump can challenge the court if he continues to lose. Others say that prisoner cases may be satisfied with the destruction as they pass through the justice system.

“As a law professor, it is strange for me to say that the law is not important as a law professor,” Chen said. “I don’t know that [Trump] He particularly cares about doing something illegal. “

Times staff writer Sandra McDonald contributed to this report.