New Nauru deal another chapter of Australia’s shameful history

The detention camps in Nauru of Australia were disturbed by public scandals, including the repeated Corruption Reports And last week’s multimilyon dollar government security contracts are controversial Secure Hands Group.

But at the same time, we marked the last entrance quietly in the relevant and much longer part of Australian history: the first ongoing collective penalty It is subject to the detention of immigrants and refugees, and the second is that our government rely on neo-colonial relations to launder domestic political problems in the Pacific.

Last week, UN Human Rights Committee made temporary orders To prevent the Australian government from deporting a 65 -year -old Iraqi refugee Nauru to live the rest of his life in the small island country.

The man at the center of the UN complaint, Human Rights Law CenterThree – selected by the Albanian government to test the new new new one – are one of the three seemingly random -looking people ”Third country lifting ”forces.

All three men were released for immigration detention. Supreme Court’s decision In November 2023, this uncertain detention is illegal. They were given bridge visas, Supreme Court Found Being an illegal punishment in November last year – 22:00 – 06:00 Wearing the curfew situation and wearing an ankle bracelet. The fact that they are taken to Nauru is the government’s attempt to impose them for life.

The third country lifting powers, coalition and media immigrant detention for months after the labor force hunting for months after the last seating week of 2024 ran to Parliament. Authorities allow the Australian government to make a paid arrangement with any other country in the world to take people who want to deport the people they want to deport, regardless of the conditions they may face in the other country. In fact, these forces are expanding Australia’s dark innovative “open sea detention” policies worldwide.

In September 2024, before the introduction of new laws to parliament, the Albanian government with the Nauru government 30 -year agreement to get people from Australia. A agreement First three people It was officially reached at the beginning of 2025. While Australia demanded that these people be given a “visa visa ,, Nauru gave them valid visas for 30 years. It is not clear what will happen after this 30 years.

More importantly, the family has no right to reunite or Road to citizenship. There was no serious assessment by the Albanian government about the dangers that refugees may encounter in Nauru during their lives, while making an agreement or applying for visas.

First agreement, a Last court orderIt includes a list of rights to be protected without any detail. Such promises are equal to previous guarantees that they will be treated for refugees in detention camps. In accordance with human rights standardsContradictory with 24 years brutal experience.

Agreement Controversial among the people of Nauruan. However, although not as popular as arrangements, the truth is that the nauru rely on income to finance Emergency Climate Adapting Measures And guarantee the future of the island.

Australia, a candidate before Protection after World War II And close to lane mining and exhaustion of natural resources. Güven, who had the emergence of Australia, provided a fertile ground for the establishment of open sea detention camps in 2001.

Now, as the sea levels rise, Nauru is looking at a future with 90% of the coastal population. It is transported to a small area of several kilometers in the highly lying areas of the country. Australia, one Highest Greenhouse gas in the world is preparing to deepen the social effects of the climate crisis by expanding sea storage operations by expanding equal contempt for immigrants and refugees, immigrants and refugees in the world.

The fight against the lifting forces of the new third country is more than three people. This is about our government to put a limit on the ability of our neighboring nations to punish immigrants and refugees and to benefit from the people of our neighboring nations. Although the UN’s intervention is able to stop these shoots for now, it is all of us to set out where we draw this line and the type of society we are ready to be.