Keir Starmer rinsed again by historian Anthony Seldon who warns ‘skates are under’ PM | Politics | News
Sir Keir Starmer was disintegrated by a leading political historian who claimed that the Prime Minister was “damaged property önce after a“ worryingly fast ”collapse in popularity. Sir Anthony Seldon entered the PM for the second time in two days and told GB News that the workers’ leader was “under the skates ve and that healing was“ very difficult ..
However, since Sir John Major, the biography of each Prime Minister said that Sir Keir would be very destructive for the country if it was to be dismissed this year, because it means an unprecedented eighth leader in just 15 years. Throughout political history, the author and the former Chief Teacher said that he was “so popular in such a popular way. After the last year’s general election victory, Sir Keir’s personal popularity began to work after starting a series of controversial policies, including removing the winter fuel allowance from most retirees.
In May, its net approval degree fell to -46%, but since then it rose to -36%.
When Sir Keir was asked whether it was possible to return his reserves, Sir Anthony said: “Very difficult.
“When they lose the confidence in the country and first of all, your own deputies, and the media partially take it, because they tell the media what it looks like in the parliamentary party or what it looks like 10.
“After losing confidence and trust, you have a sign that says ‘damaged property’, and people are just waiting for that moment.”
Sir Anthony said that Sir John never saved the authority that Britain had to withdraw from the exchange rate mechanism in 1992 in 1992.
Similarly, Gordon Brown said that after he did not call an expected general election in 2007, he never regained his stance in surveys and led to allegations of “bottled”.
However, the historian Sir Keir said: “From another perspective, he would not be good for the country if he told a successor in autumn. He would be eight different prime ministers in 15 years.
“This is unique. This is not good for democracy. It is not good for economic stability. It is not good for England to be perceived as a trade country, as a reliable partner.
“Many people would ask him to go, but from a national point of view, it would be better to get rid of it and to show his commitment to growth.”
The authority added that it is not more important than ensuring the growth of the economy because it has been flattened since 2008.
Only a day ago, Sir Anthony said: Sir No Work Prime Minister has certainly never started since 1945. ”
The author said that the Prime Minister was incapable of gösterme with the ignorance of such history and how you carried out yourself as Prime Minister ”and a vision of where he took the country.
Sir Anthony, who referred to the last U -turn of Sir Keir’s benefits cuts, said, bir If there is an open vision outside, a story about where it leads to the workers’ government and the country, maybe they may understand why this segment is necessary. But there are too many fingers slippers.
“Basically tells the story of an incompetent prime minister. He repeats the same mistakes.”
