UK ‘not concluded’ Israel committing genocide in Gaza, Lammy says | Israel-Gaza war
England The ministers did not conclude that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza or F-35 jets sold to Israel directly led to violations of international human law.
The ministers also rejected the calls for an independent control of arms sales, but admitted that the Israeli attack in Gaza was not in a position to say whether it was a violation of any humanitarian law due to the complexity of the war land.
They rejected that the crime and the police invoice for the UK and Wales will be changed to facilitate the trial of foreign nationals suspected of war crimes, including deprivation of assistance or the murder of aid workers, and that there was a change that would facilitate the arrest of Israeli government leaders if they visited Britain.
Isaac Herzog, the president of Israel, will visit London on Wednesday and give an address here and visit 10.
In a report on the position of the British government, the protection of humanitarian workers, in response to the suggestions of the committee, a letter came from David Lammy, the external secretary, to the Sarah Champion President of the International Development Election Committee.
The government said that the British Government has explored the impact of a temporary policy of finding Israel’s invasion of Palestine by the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ).
These findings were published in June 2024 and the court called on them to move. Ministers say that they still examine the non -binding decision “seriousness and meticulously ..
The government’s claim that Israel does not do genocide is likely to be controversial in the Labor Party. The ministers took different positions, sometimes it can determine that ICJ can only determine whether a genocide has occurred, and that the internal department assessments in the UK internal courts at other times can determine that a genocide does not continue and that women and children are not targeted.
In a letter to the championship, Lammy said, “High civilian losses, including women and children, and the comprehensive destruction in Gaza are completely terrified. According to the Genocide Congress, there is a special intention to destroy the crime of genocide only in a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.
The formulation, which ministers carefully think of a genocide risk, approaches the government that accepts whether a genocide has occurred, rather than referring the problem to a final determination by ICJ within a few years.
Two Israeli -based Human Rights Organizations, Bsselem and Human Rights doctors, in July, said that Israel had genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza and joined a number of international and Palestinian groups that define the war as genocide.
Last month, hundreds of employees of the UN’s leading Human Rights Agency supported an internal letter that demanded that its leadership to declare a genocide of Israel’s attacker.
Israel carries out a genocide and says that the war in Gaza is defense.
Lammy, the finding that Israel did not act in order to make a genocide, implies in his letter, eliminating the task of acting according to the responsibility of preventing ministers in the 1948 genocide convention. This task is triggered, in his letter Lammy, only when the UK learns the existence of a serious genocide risk or normally learns ”.
Hükümetin Gazze’de işlenen iddia edilen bireysel zulümlerin çoğunu göz önünde bulundurmaktan kaçınmasını kolaylaştıran bir analizde, Seçim Komitesi’ne “çatışma durumlarında uluslararası insancıl hukukun olası ihlallerine olası bir yorum sağlayamadıklarını söyledi. İHL ihlallerinin, ihlallerin, ihlallerin, ihlallerin, ihlallerin, ihlallerin, belirli bir şekilde yapılan kanalların yürütülmesinde, belirli bir şekilde kullanılmaya neden olup olmadığını, belirli bir şekilde yapılandırma They said that the decision to be used, deciding on detailed information, whether they have decided to be used in detail and the military advantage of the attack of the attack.
Yarmak Damage to civilians and civil infrastructure is a tragic aspect of the armed conflict, but it does not mean that the IHL is violated or committed to war crimes, especially in cases where the parties are among the civilian population and civilian infrastructure ”.
