Ultra Violette pulls Lean Screen sunscreen from shelves as new tests find ‘inconsistent’ SPF protection | Health

Sunscreen Company Ultra Violette said that after the new tests found a “paternity of inconsistency ında in the SPF results, it will immediately withdraw the lean screen scalp product immediately from the market.

The company’s founding partners Ava Chandler-Matthews and Bec Jeffferd published the test results in a statement that they apologized to customers, offered refund and stop using the product.

In June, Ultra Violette ordered an additional test after publishing an investigation of the SPF allegations of many popular sunscreen brands, including the consumer advocacy group election and Ultra Violette.

_{Registration: AU Breaking News E -Post}

In the election test, the Ultra Violette Lean SCF SPF SPF 50 plus Mattiling Zinc Leather screen, which is a high -level product sold up to $ 50, returned only 4 SPF results in the selection test. The election said that a second test has returned the result of 5.

Ultra Violette explained the findings of the election to the public. However, on Friday, Chandler-Matthews and Jeffferd said that the results of their additional tests vary “important” and “atypical”.

In a statement published on Ultra Violette’s website and Instagram, Chandler-Matthews and Jeffferd said that they had eight different tests from multiple independent laboratories.

“Lean screen has now returned 4, 10, 21, 26, 33, 60, 61 and 64 SPF data,” he said. “This wasn’t good enough for us and it’s not good enough for you.”

Chandler-Matthews and Jeffferd stressed that their announcements were “only about the performance of the lean screen”. They said that the tests of Ultra Violette’s other products çıkar strengthened our confidence in the rest of our line ”.

Election General Manager Ashley de Silva said in June that the sunscreen testing results in the interest of the public.

“Ultra Violette’s announcement of Ultra Violette confirmed that there is a clear problem of how it was organized and tested in Australia, Sil said Silva.

“Without Choice’s investigation, Ultra Violette’s simple screen would still be on the shelves, although it was not close to the amount of sun protection it claims.”

De Silva, the therapeutic goods Administration (TGA), after the start of publishing the results of the Election after the start of the investigation of the sunscreen test began to update.

On Thursday, TGA issued a statement stating that the investigation on the website has continued.

“Considering the complexity and scale of the material material, this process will take time,” regulator said.

“Sun protection factor variability in test results… It is a known issue,” he said.

“TGA is currently reviewing the current SPF test requirements. In doing so, TGA is investigating alternative test methods that may be more reliable, including in vitro test methods.”