google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
USA

Under Trump, U.S. an active investor at scale not seen outside major crises

The Trump administration received direct stocks on a rare scale in the United States, outside the war time or economic crisis, and forced a republican party that traditionally pushed free market capitalism to adopt state intervention to industries, which are considered important for national security.

Japan’s Nippon Steel agreed to give President Donald Trump to give a “gold share” in US Steel as a condition for the controversial merger of the two companies. Trump is now using vetors’ power of the nation according to the great business decisions of the nation. Third largest steel manufacturer.

“Do you know who has a gold share? I do,” Trump said on July 15 at the Artificial Intelligence and Energy Summit in Pittsburgh.

The president’s gold share in US Steel is similar to nationalizing a company, but a company’s foreign investment and national security expert in the Atlantic Council, which is a thought -focus focus on international affairs without the benefits of a company normally received by the government, said.

However, the Trump administration showed that it was willing to buy directly to public companies at the beginning of this month. The Ministry of Defense agreed to buy a stock of $ 400 million in Rare Toprak Mining DeputyPentagon makes the company’s biggest shareholder.

Gracelin Basque, who is an expert in critical minerals at the Strategic and International Research Center, said that the federal government’s wife was not seen for a mining company.

“This is the biggest public-private cooperation of the mining industry in the United States.” He said. “Historically, DOD did not do any equality in a mining company or a mining project.”

Trump’s unique holding on the Republican Party gave him the ability to intervene in companies on a scale that would be politically difficult for a democratic president.

“The Democratic Communist would be accused of being a communist, and many other Republicans would probably not move comfortably in this special direction because of their commitment to market principles.” He said. Trump is expanding the range of what is possible in the US in terms of state intervention in markets.

The White House did not respond immediately to the request for comments.

More states are likely to invest

The Trump administration may have more intervention on the horizon, as it develops a policy to support US companies in strategic industries against state -supported competition from China.

Inner secretary Doug Burgum In April, the US government, “critical minerals seizing China seizing each of these companies to invest in equity” may need to do, he said. CEO James Linsky, Pentagon’s investment in MP Materials is a model for future public-private partnerships, he said.

You. Dave McCormick Nippon-ABD Steel Agreement: A win-win for both sides

“A new way to accelerate free markets and get the supply chain on the shore we want.” He said. The CEO helps the US government to fight the mining industry “Chinese Mercantilism”.

In the meantime, the Golden Sharing in US Steel, in an interview with CNBC in May, is a potential model for direct investments that “really affects our national security, but will be great for our economic growth”.

Don Bilson, an analyst in Gordon Haskett, wrote a note to customers at the beginning of this month.

In January, Trump suggested that the US should take a 50% stake in Tiktok, a social media practice as part of the joint attempt. China’s stale is necessary in accordance with a recently adopted law to disposal Tiktok, or the platform will be banned from the US Trump until September 17th.

Past precedent

China looks great

The United States has increasingly noticed that the economic model of China is based on excessive capacity that “to” make it difficult for other markets to compete in global markets “.

Baskaran said that China’s threat revealed by the dominance of the rare soil supply chain in April, when Beijing imposed export restrictions against the United States. Automobile manufacturers warned that they would rarely have to stop production due to soil shortage over weeks and forced the US back to the negotiation table with Beijing.

“The historical moment we are in seems to be the re -evaluation of the previous generation’s assumptions to solve all our problems in national security, and the assumptions of the previous generation to solve all our problems in national security.” He said.

The question is whether the state intervention cannot solve its failure to address national security concerns in industries such as rare lands.

“With such a state intervention, when you try to deal with one of these market failures, you can get a series of new market failures.” He said. “You distort the market more.”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button