‘Unpicking Brexit?’ Readers debate EU youth mobility scheme as poll shows Reform voters’ shift

AS A new survey shows that UK supporters support a youth mobility plan with the EU, Independent Readers held a discussion about plan and wider consequences of Brexit.

Many readers said that young people had a certain reason to feel victims – most of them were too young to vote in 2016, and they could greatly oppose Brexit, but now they are the most limited in living, working and education.

Others emphasized that voting to leave is one of the worst economic mistakes in modern history and that England should approach the EU for growth and stability.

Some said that a youth mobility plan is only the beginning and that the final long -term solution participated again.

But not all were accepted. A few, such plans insisted that “not lifting Brexit ve and said that Britain already has similar arrangements with countries outside the EU.

A commentator claimed that the remains are now defective for reform, and that a second referendum could give a greater vote of Brexit, which was completely connected by a government.

Here is what you have to say:

A compelling moral case for youth

We all need more flexibility than travel and mobility to the EU. There is a compelling moral case for young people, because less of them had the chance to vote and most of those who opposed Brexit.

However, not only young people, but a burden for all people. This is a nightmare in my field (university research) because it is based on international cooperation and mobility.

Tanaquil2

One of the worst economic decisions in history

In 2016, the vote of leaving the EU was one of the most disastrous economic decisions in the history of this country. David Cameron’s “super” majority vote (60/40) is a good measure of arrogance and arrogance.

The sooner we can join again. We should also be accepted early in the euro area. Whether you like it or like it, the world is settled in a series of powerful economic and military blocks, and without EU membership, England is now just a minnow. It is nothing more than a tragedy that we have such an advantageous membership of the EU.

Hamps

Youth Mobility is not freedom of movement

England has youth mobility plans with various countries, so a youth mobility plan “does not remove Brexit”.

Britain already has Australia, Canada, Monako, New Zealand, San Marino, Iceland, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. These were founded by conservative British governments. The altar approached several EU members and asked them for a youth mobility plan. They reported to the EU Commission, all other EU members and EU’s decided to write a joint proposal to the altar.

In order to be suitable for this visa, candidates must have sufficient financial instruments and a comprehensive health insurance – tested both before and during their accommodation. In addition, only one EU is valid for the member state, it does not contain FOM within the EU.

True European

Farage error

Here we go. Who will break who is a big mistake with many unpredictable punishment if Farage has been followed and they do this in the future.

Together with Johnson and the other leading Brexiteers group, England caused more damage to England than that everyone could imagine.

Companies went to the wall, the food imports and exports are connected to the UK bureaucracy as much as produced in the UK, the seas and waterways of the UK are filthy, economy is more expensive, things are gone and there are many things that do not change for better. Wait until you need to pay for ETIAS and Biometric data obligation, then you will know that you belong to a third country. Now suddenly, they want to start choosing EU membership lice, which makes their lives easier. Soon they will learn that Cherry Picking is not on the EU agenda.

When they go to the polls, they would be good if they think carefully, because attempting to send a farage to the farage to negotiate anything with the EU will be a complete waste of time. Of course, he would come back, claiming that the EU had not achieved anything – which would not do it – because one of the people who were never blamed for the farage, always others. The child who broke the window by leaving someone else to take the crime! Being a part of the EU is not suitable for the Farage, because they have their own ideas about self -strengthening and enrichment.

The EU was pleased to see the back of it, and they will definitely not always ask for any relationship with someone who is in trouble, which causes interruption where it can be, but they are also rude and insulting!

Ambigirls

There is a case for Brexiteers to answer

It should not be surprising that reform and Farage are very timid about Brexit these days. A policy in which they are very closely involved and supported has been seen as a great failure.

It is clear that the British people noticed this.

However, why should voters trust these people to make the right call on something else? I didn’t support Brexit, but it was applied. There is a case for those who support this to answer. What’s so good about it? Or did they say pig pies?

Don’t trust people like this again.

49niner

Slow AB

Therefore, Brexiters do not have to stand in a slow -free queue at the airports. This is strange because this is what they vote for, and now the future EES and ETIAS have an additional burden. Oh dear.

Hammer71

Youth Mobility does not participate again

A youth mobility plan has nothing to do with the steps to re -participate – Britain has many countries with youth mobility plans. And Starmer will not take a step towards joining again. This is the only word he sticks to.

True European

Excluded from Johnson’s agreement

I do not think that Boris Johnson’s agreement with the EU (contrary to most of what he said before the vote) excludes the youth mobility with the rest of the freedom of movement.

Epaminonds

Only closer ties can solve confusion

Even a good idea, such as the Youth Mobility Program, will not bring back billions and billions of farage, and Tories lost us. It is the only way to deal with economic growth and global migration problems with the EU. Tories and reform DNAs do not exist to do this.

Hammerhead72

Remaining for reform

All this shows that the rest are now defective for reform. I bet, today another Brexit referendum will probably produce the same result for the last time with a bigger difference.

The questionnaires may begin to ask a clear question if there were a government behind our decision to leave, instead of a double -back, which has never been trying to work.

Oltom

Some comments are arranged for shortness and clarity for this article.

I want to share Your views? Just save your information below. Once you have registered, you can comment on the best stories of the day for a chance to stand out. Alternatively, click ‘login’ or ‘registration in the upper right corner to log in or sign.

Make sure you follow us Community Directiveswhich can be found Here. For a complete guide about how to comment Click here.