Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez says Israel is ‘exterminating a defenceless people’ | Israel-Gaza war

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez accelerated the scary criticism of Israel’s actions, accusing the government of Benjamin Netanyahu with the government by “destroying a vulnerable person” and “killing boys and girls with hunger”.

Speaking to announce a prevention epidemic designed to increase the pressure of Netanyahu on the military campaign on Monday morning, Sánchez said that the Spanish government was forced to ör stop a massacre ”, although Israel will always support the right to existence and self -defense.

“Protecting your country and your society is something, but bombing hospitals and killing innocent boys and girls with hunger,” he said.

“What Prime Minister Netanyahu presented as a military operation in October 2023 as a military operation in response to terrible terrorist attacks has become an unjust wave of illegal wave and an unfair attack against the Palestinian civilian population – an attack that the majority of the UN special rapporteur and experts have already defined as a genocide.”

The Spanish Prime Minister drew attention to the number of dead, wounded, displaced and malnutrition. “This does not defend himself; he doesn’t even get into this attack,” he said. “This destroys vulnerable people. He breaks all the rules of human law.”

Sánchez was once again shot in the international community and said that the great world forces were paralyzed between the Prime Minister Netanyahu government and an uncomfortable conflict and indifference to guilt ”.

Among the measures, he declared ör to stop the genocide in Gaza and to pursue its perpetrators ”. There was a law for actual prohibition on military equipment sales or purchases with Israel, and a law for the use of Spanish ports and airports, a law to carry fuel or weapons to the Israeli army. Sánchez also said that Spain will not be allowed to “those who are directly interested in genocide” and that their country’s humanitarian aid to Gaza will not be declared.

“We know that all these measures will not be enough to stop the invasion or war crimes,” he said. “But we hope that they will contribute to the pressure on the Prime Minister Netanyahu and the government, and we will serve to alleviate some of the Palestinian population and to allow the Spaniards to know that their countries are on the right side of history when they come to one of the worst parts of the 21st century.”

Sánchez’s interpretations and measures received an angry response from the Israeli government, who accused his administration of using the use of “wild and hateful discourse, and accusing a“ constant anti -Israeli and anti -Semitic attack üzere in order to get away from allegations of corruption.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar announced that two senior leftist Spanish politicians – Deputy Minister of Labor and Deputy Prime Minister Sira Rego will be banned from entering Israel because of the criticism of Israel’s behavior in Gaza.

Sa’ar said that Díaz, the founder of the Sumar Alliance, the young partner of the coalition government led by Sánchez’s socialist, said, “Prime Minister Sánchez exploited the political weakness and dragged step by step to implement his anti -Israeli and anti -E weremithic vision”.

Sánchez’s comments came almost a week after the guardian told Guardian’s response to Israel’s attack on Palestinian territory.

On Sunday, the Supreme Court of Israel decided that the government could not provide enough food to Palestinian security prisoners for basic livelihoods and ordered the authorities to improve their nutrition. The decision was a rare case that the country’s highest court decided by the government’s behavior during almost two years of war.

The three justice panels have unanimously decided that the state had to provide sufficient food to prisoners to prisoners to provide a “basic level of existence”. Justice, in their decisions, “prisoners found that the existing food supply does not guarantee the suitability of the legal standard” He ordered that prisoners had found “real doubts ve and the prison service to take steps to procure their basic livelihoods according to the law”.