US supreme court clears way for Trump officials to resume mass government firings | Trump administration

The US Supreme Court paved the way for Donald Trump’s administration to maintain plans for the mass fires of federal workers, warning critics that critics may threaten critical government services.

Extending a winning line for the US President, Justice on Tuesday As the case progressed, a frozen federal, known as “decrease in force ,, raised a lower court order that was dismissed.

Decision, agriculture, trade, health and human services, states, treasury, veterans and other agencies can lead to hundreds of thousands of work loss.

The Democrats condemned the decision. A party strategist Antjuan Seawright said: ım I was disappointed, but I was not shocked or surprised. This right -wing activist court proved that they will sing songs from time to time and that they would dance for Trumpism melody.“

The project, a plan prepared by the conservative heritage Foundation Thinkank, has prepared a plan to underestimate the government. Trump claimed that the voters had given him a task for effort, and since Musk has been separated since then, he touched the billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the accusation through the “Ministry of Efficiency” or Dogge.

In February, Trump led the “critical transformation of the federal bureaucracy” to prepare agencies for a government revision aiming to significantly reduce the labor force and reduce offices.

The Supreme Court, in his short decision on Tuesday, said that the Trump administration would “be successful in the claim of the executive order” and that a memorandum that implements the order was legal. The court said that any special plan for layoffs in federal institutions did not evaluate the legality.

Liberal justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only member of the nine -person court opposing the public from the decision of San Francisco -based regional judge Susan Illston, which overthrew the May 22 decision of Susan Illston.

Jackson wrote that Illston’s temporary, practical, damaging protection of the status quo does not match the legally suspicious actions of this court’s legally in the emergency stance of this President ”.

He also described his colleagues as to make wrong decisions at the wrong moment, considering that they knew very little about what this court actually happened in the place. ”

Illston claimed that Trump had exceeded his authority to assign with a group of unions, non -profit organizations and local governments challenging management. “As history has shown, the President of the Federal agencies can only be reconstructed to a large extent when authorized by the Congress,” he wrote.

The judge prevented the agencies from making collective layoffs and limited their ability to cut or overcome federal programs. Illston also ordered the restore of the workers who lost their jobs, but while playing the appeal process, he delayed this part of his decision.

Illston’s decision was the widest of the kind of re -destruction of the government monitored by Trump and Dge. Tens of thousands of federal workers were fired, left their jobs through postponed resignation programs or allowed.

The administration had previously decided on Illston’s Ninth US Appeal Court based in San Francisco, but on May 30, he had lost his 2-1 decision. This pushed the Ministry of Justice to make an urgent request to the Supreme Court, claiming that the control of the personnel of federal institutions was “in the heart of the executive branch authority of the President.

The plaintiffs invited the Supreme Court to reject the request of the Ministry of Justice. He wrote that the Trump administration will progress with the “highly restructuring”, “the programs, offices and functions in the federal government will be removed, that the agencies will be authorized by the Congress, that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will lose their jobs”.

The Supreme Court rejected this claim on Tuesday was welcomed by Trump allies. Public Prosecutor Pam Bondi, X published on social media platform: “Today, the Supreme Court prevented the restriction of President Trump, who had another Supreme Court victory thanks to @thejusticeept lawyers, to restrict the authority on federal personnel.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs He wrote on x: “Today, unanimous decision from the Supreme Court confirms that the law is on our side during this process. As explained in the early this year, we will continue to progress with our historical restructuring plan in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

In recent months, the Supreme Court has been with Trump in some major cases that have been acting in emergencies since he returned to office in January.

He explained the way of deporting immigrants to countries other than them without providing the chance to show the damages they may face. In two cases, he allowed the administration to end the temporary legal status given to hundreds of thousands of immigrants for humanitarian reasons.

He also allowed Trump to implement his ban on transsexual people in the US army, prevented a judge’s order of restarting thousands of fiery employees of the administration and was twice with Dogge. In addition, the Court increased the power of making decisions throughout the country, which prevents federal judges’ presidential policies.

On Tuesday, the Advanced Coalition of Democracy condemned the Supreme Court for intervening in Trump’s illegal reorganization of the federal government. CT He said in a statement: “Today’s decision has taken a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that the American people trust in danger.

“This decision does not change a simple and clear fact that reorganizing government functions and collective dismissal of federal workers collectively without any congress approval is not allowed by our Constitution.”