Voters love local governments but want to get rid of them

The federal government’s performance was rated good by 39 percent. 31 percent said the federal government’s performance was poor, while 15 percent rated it very poor (the highest rate of any level of government).

Despite supporting their local council, respondents were more likely to agree that he should be sacked.

Loading

When asked which layer of government was least needed, 27 per cent chose councils, while 26 per cent said they should be cut from state governments. Only 9 percent of respondents said the country could survive without the federal government.

Local councils are by far the largest source of elected officials in the country. There are 4755 local councillors, mayors and regional heads, as well as 226 federal MPs and 599 state politicians.

Labor voters (30 per cent) were more likely than Coalition supporters (23 per cent) to believe councils are the least needed level of government. But Liberal and National supporters (29 per cent) are more supportive of ending state governments than Labor voters (23 per cent).

There was a high level of uncertainty among all voters; 38 percent of respondents were undecided or had no preference on what level of government should go.

But survey respondents were much more confident about how the government should work together.

Only 4 percent disagreed with the suggestion that laws, regulations and taxes should be aligned so that they are consistent in every state. Seventy-three percent of people said they strongly agreed, with 31 percent agreeing.

23 percent said they were neutral or undecided.

The most recent meeting of federal and state treasurers agreed to overhaul occupational licensing regulations, primarily in electrical and engineering, so that certified workers can easily move between states and territories.

Along with harmonizing regulations on household electrical goods such as toasters and changes to building and construction rules, states have been offered cash from the federal government’s $900 million National Productivity Fund to accelerate reforms.

This imprint’s report to the federation revealed deep dissatisfaction among state premiers with policy areas where responsibility is often shared with Canberra.

These included health, aged care and education, where the federal government has gradually intervened over the past 70 years.

Loading

The survey found that 58 percent of people want policy areas to be the responsibility of government at some level, with only 9 percent disagreeing.

Forty-seven percent of people agreed that state governments should provide services without the need for elected representatives or parliaments. Such a move would disrupt states that would effectively become unelected, bureaucracy-led governments.

One-third of those polled were neutral or undecided about such a change, which would face nearly insurmountable constitutional hurdles to implement.