Donald Trump’s son offers blunt seven-word verdict on Greenland takeover | World | News

Coastline in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland (Image: Getty)
US President Donald Trump’s son, Eric Trump, made a striking seven-word assessment of the increasing tension over Greenland and said: “We can’t be babies. We can’t be naive.” The comment comes as debate about the strategic importance of the Arctic region grows as the Trump administration intensifies its push for greater US influence on the island.
Speaking in an exclusive interview with Al Arabiya English’s Tom Burges Watson published earlier this week, Eric Trump highlighted Greenland’s role in global security. Addressing the Middle Eastern broadcaster, he said: “Greenland is strategically important for many reasons, for many global reasons, for many security reasons; not just for the United States, but for pretty much the entire Western world, including exactly where you come from.” Statements underline US renewed focus on Greenland Donald TrumpHis return to the White House in January 2025 following his 2024 presidential election victory.
Read more: Trump ‘ready to invoke the Insurrection Act and send troops to Minnesota’
Read more: As war fears increase, the USA seized another tanker

Eric Trump, son of Donald Trump (Image: Al Arabiya English)
The self-governing territory of Denmark, home to approximately 56,000 people and the world’s largest island, has long attracted attention for its vast untapped resources and geopolitical location. It is home to the US-operated Thule Air Base, a major facility for missile warning and space surveillance.
Highlighting the emerging threats, Eric Trump noted: “Greenland is increasingly becoming a source of conversation, especially as some northern sea routes open up and especially as more people turn to militarizing this part of the world.”
Climate change has accelerated the melting of Arctic ice and could shorten transit times between Europe and Asia by opening new shipping routes such as the Northern Sea Route. This has attracted the attention of rivals such as Russia, which is strengthening its military presence in the Arctic with new bases and icebreakers, and China, which is investing in polar research and mining ventures.
The Trump family’s involvement adds a personal dimension to the policy push. Eric Trump was matching his father’s assertive stance as he set aside short-term business plans (“If you’re asking me if I’m considering bringing a hotel to Greenland in the near future, I think the answer is probably not that”)

US President Donald Trump (Image: Getty)
He concluded: “We can’t just pretend something that happened didn’t happen. I think my father, you know, will eventually do whatever it takes to make sure that America’s western way of life, but the western way of life, and Europe is safe and protected against forces that don’t have our best interests at heart.”
This echoes President Trump’s own statements in early 2026, in which he promised that the United States would continue to buy “whether we like it or not.” Options discussed in Washington include diplomatic negotiations, economic incentives or more coercive measures; but military action appears to be downplayed due to alliance concerns.
The administration has designated Greenland as a national security priority, citing its rare earth minerals essential for electronics and defense technology and the potential for advanced missile defense systems such as the proposed “Gold Dome” shield.
Denmark and Greenland have flatly rejected the idea of any sale or forced transfer. Greenlandic Prime Minister Múte Egede reiterated last week that the island’s future was “not for sale,” echoing sentiments from 2019 when Mr. Trump first floated the idea during his first presidency. Opinion polls in Greenland show more than 80% oppose US annexation, with concerns over sovereignty and environmental impacts.
The interview forms part of a media campaign carried out during the high-level talks. US, Danish and Greenlandic officials met in Copenhagen on January 14, 2026, to discuss cooperation, but sources indicate little progress was made on ownership issues.
Critics, including European allies, warn that aggressive US rhetoric risks straining NATO ties, given Denmark’s membership.
Analysts see this crackdown as part of broader U.S. efforts to counter Arctic encroachment. While Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 increases fears about vulnerabilities in the north, China’s “Polar Silk Road” initiative is seeking economic support. The US has increased investments, including a £30 million ($40 million) aid package for infrastructure in Greenland in 2025.
As tensions rise, Eric Trump’s outspoken decision reflects the administration’s no-nonsense approach and signals that the United States views Greenland not as a whim but as a necessity in an increasingly contested world.




