The truth teller and the celebrity silk duel
In the twin worlds of litigation and show business, actor-director Rebel Wilson’s cross-examination by celebrity-slandering silk Sue Chrysanthou promised to headline a clash between show ponies.
Wilson stars in the drama, which covers his directorial debut in musical comedy Debt as a brave underdog defending truth, justice, women and Australian taxpayers.
“Everyone knows I’m a ‘truth teller’ when it comes to bad people in the industry,” he said in one of the social media posts for which he was sued.
Chrysanthou describes herself as a warrior for the wronged, and in this case, she is acting on behalf of 27-year-old actor Charlotte MacInnes, who claims Wilson persecuted her fledgling career in the film industry by portraying her as a sellout and a liar.
In a controversial social media post over the dispute, MacInnes is seen singing on billionaire Len Blavatnik’s superyacht in Cannes, singing a cover of Chappell Roan’s hit song. Pink Pony Club. The refrain echoed as Wilson smiled through the flashing cameras on his way to court.
But if Wilson had planned to have fun, he hadn’t taken into account that Chrysanthou would pull out a pony stick from under her robes and hit him over the head with it.
Chrysanthou is nervous and impatient with opposing counsel Dauid Sibtain SC and fed up with the answers falling from the witness’s lips.
Wilson is as impassive on the witness stand as he is in his acting roles. “You’ve made some very big statements about a lot of things,” he said of Chrysanthou on Tuesday.
The “provocative incident”, as they call it, was an episode at Bondi Beach in September 2023 during the film’s pre-production, where MacInnes went swimming with producer Amanda Ghost, Ghost claimed she was having a medical crisis, and they both warmed up in the bath in their swimsuits.
Wilson believes the shower was involved. He describes it as “the bath and shower thing.” MacInnes denies the shower was involved. The legal team describes it as a “bathroom incident.”
The stage was set for a showdown.
A year later, Wilson told her social media followers that MacInnes had first filed a complaint about the incident before withdrawing any sexual harassment complaints to further her career. MacInnes maintains that Ghost never acted inappropriately and never filed a complaint.
But subtopics are many.
Wilson faces two more lawsuits along with his co-producers DebtIncluding a libel claim brought by Ghost and clashing with the screenwriter over writing credits. He claimed Australian taxpayers were defrauded under funding arrangements.
Watching the proceedings from the front row was Ghost himself; his head was down and his eyes focused on Wilson as he gave his statement; Sometimes he would exchange meaningful glances with a group sitting in the back row. His own claim against Wilson remains.
Near the end of the second day, Judge Elizabeth Raper interrupted the hearing to chastise one of the observers, who she said was “shaking her head” at points in Wilson’s testimony and would be removed from the court if this behavior continued.
“Maybe he doesn’t understand the Australian legal system… but I’m concerned that affects the integrity of the evidence,” Judge Raper said.
The complexity of legal proceedings provides fertile ground for Chrysanthou as he attempts to bypass evidence of lies, inconsistencies, and falsehoods.
“There are a lot of different documents in the cases, so there could be inconsistencies,” Wilson acknowledged but vehemently denied any falsehood.
According to the timeline set by MacInnes, Wilson appeared to accept his assurance that nothing untoward had happened in the days after the incident and attempted to discredit him with Ghost by labeling him a “troublemaker” while the pair were holidaying on Hamilton Island.
At the time, Wilson suspected MacInnes of leaking information to screenwriter Hannah Reilly to help her get a larger share of the film’s profits.
The court heard that it wasn’t until a month later that Wilson raised concerns about the bathroom incident, amid a looming dispute with Ghost over contractual arrangements.
MacInnes alleges that when she denied being traumatized by the incident, Wilson questioned her motives and that she reported the sexual harassment complaint to her social media followers in good faith, but MacInnes asked her to drop it. “The fact that this girl is now hired by this ‘producer’… should be all the evidence you need as to why she changed her story.”
But Wilson on Wednesday refused to use the sexual assault allegation as leverage in his financial dispute with Ghost, saying his concerns about the “bathroom and shower thing” had never gone away.
“I was confused and a little bit, I can’t describe it, just this uneasy feeling,” he said. “It was really exciting.”
Wilson’s insight was a persistent theme of his evidence on Wednesday; this included funder Len Blavatnik’s hypothesis. DebtThe fact that his plane had landed in Sydney eight days earlier was also financing the defamation case, which clearly proved this.
Chrysanthou: “Are you saying that the lawyers acting for Ms MacInnes arrived in Sydney on a private jet?”
Wilson: “I would suggest that members of a Russian oligarch billionaire’s team arrived in Sydney a week ago.”
Did Wilson use similar logic to support other claims he made in his testimony? Chrysanthou posed.
“When I present my evidence, it is based on my actual memories,” Wilson replied. “Sometimes the documents remind me. Sometimes I would say one makes one two and make a logical decision about things.”
Start your day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
