Epstein DOJ files face technical glitches and heavy redaction criticism

The Justice Department’s efforts to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s sex trafficking cases by a legal deadline fell short of expectations Friday, prompting complaints ranging from technological glitches to overredactions to missing documents.

Just after 3 p.m., the highly anticipated website containing the documents went live with a message informing visitors that they were “in line.” The page never progressed and would crash occasionally. After the files became visible, some people were still reporting that they could not access the website.

“Made me wait for these Epstein files like it was the 2019 Yeezy sale,” one user said wrote In X.

The law required the files to be searchable, but New York University law professor Ryan Goodman was among those who observed this. search bar feature The content on the website was also not being captured reliably. Some on the left pointed out that President Donald Trump’s name did not initially appear on any documents. Trump was one of many wealthy friends of Epstein before he faced charges. The search bar appeared to be working as of Friday night.

SCHUMER ACCUSES TRUMP ADMINISTRATOR OF ‘COVERING’ THE EPSTEIN FILES AMONG DOCUMENT DISPUTE

But the most widespread criticism focused on what critics described as incomplete publication and extensive proofreads. The Justice Department said it was necessary to redact information that could identify victims or minors.

In a letter to Congress, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche called the Justice Department’s effort to fulfill its obligations under the Epstein Files Transparency Act “historic.”

Blanche said the documents went through a rigorous review and redaction process involving more than 200 lawyers, and that some Justice Department components produced slices of files this week that required more time for review. He said he expects the rest of the files to be uploaded to the website within two weeks.

Rep. Ro Khanna, Calif., Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. speaks at a press conference on the Epstein Files Transparency Act outside the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, November 18, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., highlighted the statutory language of the Epstein Files Transparency Act regarding X.

“Unfortunately, today’s document released by @AGPamBondi and @DAGToddBlanche is largely out of keeping with the spirit of the legislation that @realDonaldTrump signed just 30 days ago,” Massie wrote. he wrote.

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., a co-sponsor of the legislation, said he and Massie were “exploring all options,” including possible defamation lawsuits or other actions against DOJ officials.

“This is an incomplete version with a lot of proofreading,” Khanna said.

DOJ PUBLISHES EPSTEIN FILES, SAYS MORE TO COME AFTER FRIDAY DEADLINE

Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks with President Donald Trump about the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in the briefing room at the White House on June 27, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Tim Young, a media fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, criticized the redactions: Publish on X and lashed out at Attorney General Pam Bondi over the Justice Department’s botched release of files that were already public earlier this year. Bondi gave file folders to right-wing social media influencers in February, but the recordings were a flop and angered a group within Trump’s base.

Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., appeared on MSNOW Friday evening and accused the administration of “breaking the law.”

CLICK TO REACH THE FOX NEWS APPLICATION

Still, the Justice Department stood by its exemplary work, saying in an online statement that “President Trump’s Department of Justice is providing historic transparency while protecting victims.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Department of Justice for comment.