2 Persons Get Rigorous RI in Separate POCSO Cases in Hyderabad

Haydarabad: A special court rape in Hayarabad sentenced two people to meticulous life imprisonment (RI) in two separate POCSO cases.
The two decisions were also delivered by Judge T. Anitha, the Judge T. Anitha, the Judge T. Anitha, who was responsible for the Fast Track Special Sessions Court for Fast Track Special Sessions Court for the Pocso cases in Haca Bhavan in Nampalli.
In the first case, the court defendant Meenathithayil Mailikara Prakash Jose (42), a shop owner, 10 -year -old daughter sexually violated and was sentenced to a meticulous life imprisonment.
The court also asked for a fine of 3,000 RS. If he could not pay the fine, the court asked for a simple imprisonment for six months. The court thinks that some RS.10 Lakh proposition is appropriate as compensation for the victim.
Gopalapuram stated that in 2015, when he was 10 years old in 2008, he began to exploit his father for his sexual desires. He raped him a few times in their homes and shops. He complained to the police who could not bear torture.
The case was later transferred to Central Crime Station (CCS). In 2016, a accusation page was opened in the Nampally court. The case was later transferred to the Gopalapuram police on 16 May 2024 with the instructions of the Deputy Director of the Police Commissioner of the Northern Region in Secunderabad.
On Thursday, while the court sentenced the defendants to meticulous RI, the case ended with conviction.
In the second case, the court sentenced the 29 -year -old gas distribution officer Durga Shankar to the prison for life imprisonment, which meant imprisonment for the rest of his natural life. The court also fined 10,000 RS and should be sentenced to simple imprisonment for six months by assumed to be paid a fine.
Mangalhat police, on March 15, 2024, the girl’s father, the defendant’s daughter of the defendant’s daughter to a hut in the city suburbs and violated him a complaint. He also took his naked pictures on his mobile phone.
The defendant continued to follow the girl in his school and other places and talked to him. As the girl was depressed, her family asked her with her. The court declared 2 lakh compensation to the victim.


