Madhya Pradesh High Court bans burning of Meghalaya honeymoon murder accused Sonam Raghuvanshi’s effigy on Dasara

The Supreme Court of Madhya Pradesh led the authorities to ensure that no effect of Sonam Raghuvanshi, who was alleged to have killed her husband during or during other people, is not burned during the Dasara festivals in Indore.

Ms. Sonam’s husband Raja Raghuvanshi disappeared during the Honeymoon of the couple during the Honeymoon of the couple on May 23, and her injured body was found in a deep valley near a waterfall in the Sohra region in the East Khasi Hills region (also known as Cherrapunji). Mrs. Sonam and the alleged boyfriend, including others were arrested in the case.

‘Paurush’ (people against unexpected rules used to maintain harassment), an Indore -based social organization, at the beginning of this week, Sonam Raghuvanshi, including his husbands, children or beech entry of women accused of disgusting murders, including the images of the ‘Surpanakha Dahan’ prepared a 11 -headed Effigy.

On Saturday, September 28, 2025, a single Justice Pranay Verma Call, such an action decided that such an action would be unacceptable in a democratic country like India and that the participants could not violate the fundamental rights guaranteed according to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court decided a petition against Sonam’s mother Sangeeta Raghuvanshi against the organization.

Emir, “the daughter of the petition in a criminal case in a criminal case and the defendant’s complaint against him and the family members, even if the petition, daughter and the whole family certainly violated the fundamental rights of such an impact can not be allowed.”

The petition owner stated that the active burning will cause serious and permanent damage to the dignity of the family and, in accordance with Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, the right to life and personal freedom and its fundamental rights covering equality before the laws.

Also read |Meghaya Honeymoon Murder: His wife confesses to join the conspiracy, says the police

Even if his daughter was accused in a criminal case, he claimed that the organization’s actions were an illegal and contrary to the constitution, that he potentially made the family’s image malignant and violated their privacy.

The state lawyer stated that an investigation would be carried out in accordance with the law, but after examining the brochures and other documents submitted by the petition owner, the court observed that the plans of the organization were evident and unacceptable.

Speech PTI On Sunday, Sangeeta Raghuvanshi, “the court, the regional collector, the police commissioner and the station council officer (SHO), such an ineffective burning does not take place and the reputation of the family to damage the illegal or contradictory actions to prevent actions.”

He also said that the organization prohibited the burning of any woman from other states of criminal charges and emphasized that such practices are unacceptable in a democratic order.

‘Paurush’s gathering Ashok Dashor, “Previously, legendary burning, adultery, immorality, lack of value and immorality as a symbolic destruction of negative qualities such as justified.