UK should work with Nato on new missile defence system to counter Russia, experts say | Defence policy

According to two authors of the British strategic defense review, British NATO should work in developing an integrated air and missile defense system after about 20 Russian planes in Poland.
Fiona Hill, a former White House Advisor, said Russia’s defenses “tested the borders” at a time when Russia’s military commitment to NATO is uncertain.
Hill, a part of the three powerful teams, said, “This is the message that it should create an integrated air and ballistic missile defense system, and Europeans should realize that they should do it themselves,” he said.
The independent defense expert said that he was standing next to the US allies, he said that such words do not mean anything, because extra American military distribution would not accompany NATO’s eastern wing.
Donald Trump said, “There was no desire to go to war outside the house, Hill Hill re -referred to the re -interpretation of the US President that he wanted to distribute the army with an extreme effort to break the crime in Chicago.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Monday that three or four out of 19 Russian planes have been reduced and the intervention rate is relatively low and that Moscow may cause more serious damage in the future, he said. Some drones flew more than a hundred miles to the Poland airspace.
Gen Alexus Gregory NATO’s high allied commander for Europe Grynkewich said that the previously reported drone numbers was “low trust ve and claimed that the advocates were not immediately clear.
However, at a press conference in Lithuania, the military commander said: “Based on the lessons coming from these events, we will continue to develop our ability to defend every inches of alliance airspace.”
British authorities, an agreement signed with Ukraine – the so -called project octopus – to block the Russian HAHEDs – to develop a large number of drones in Poland and Ukraine, he said.
Defense Secretary John Healey said to the DSEI Weapon Fair in London, Britain should be more ready to fight ve in a war to deter him the growing Russian aggression, and that weapons like the project octopus drones would serve both British and Ukrainian interests in the future.
Healey said, şey What we have is learning from the Ukrainians, ”he said. “What we buy is shared IP [intellectual property]. What we have achieved is not only the products we produce with Ukrainians available for ourselves and our own armed forces, not just to make Ukrainians and their defenses. “
After the bulletin promotion
On Monday, Healey said that the British army wanted Britain to think about how Poland could support air defenses. Another option to be taken into consideration is to contribute to the role of Raf Typhoon Jets as an enlarged air police in Eastern Europe – six of the warriors were NATO as part of a rotating mission in the early summer.
Former Army General Sir Richard Barrons, a second member of the defense review team, said that the number of drones involved in the fact that the number of drones appeared rather than Gerbera trap drones rather than the armed HAHEDs, it shows that Russia is a clearly deliberate attack, although it means “a small act of provocation”.
The drone attack showed that Barrons was a shorter than dealing with a small tactical problem ”. He added that using a fighter aircraft to shoot drones is a “gigantic extremism ve, but it should be“ to rise quite quickly to improve the mid -to -mid -level air defense ”.
He also argued that the prevention of missiles and drone attacks on the Western airspace meant “defending the goal line” and effective deterrence would require the Russian Jets to start an attack on the western airspace. However, it is not possible that such an approach will find good with politicians who emphasize that NATO is a defense alliance.




