Mandelson could be in line for huge payout after sacking over Epstein links
Lord Mandelson may be listed by Sir Keir Starmer for a significant payment financed by the taxpayer after being dismissed by Pedophil Jeffrey Epstein.
Sir Keir, who chose the worker Grandee to become the man of England in Washington, dismissed him after the publication of Lord Mandelson sent supportive messages even when Epstein was sentenced to prison for sex crimes.
No 10, E -Posts, when the peer is appointed “financially different” information from the known information, he said.
However, experts may need to compensate for Lord Mandelson by deciding not to resign after e -mails.
Lord Mandelson argues that the British as a Washington Ambassador to Washington is open to his long relationship with Epstein when he is controlled for work.
It is said that HR personnel were brought to ensure that they are legal justification for the dismissal, Times On Saturday, there were concerns that Lord Mandelson did not think of going to go quietly ”in the government.
In the past, senior officers received great payments after leaving the government after the discussions.
Official figures later, former senior officer Sir Philip Rutnam, who left the allegations of bullying against Ev secretary Priti Patel, left the allegations of bullying against the house secretary Priti Patel and solved his case for £ 340,000.
And Sir Philip Barton, a senior official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, resigned eight months before his five -year contract ended, and received more than 260,000 volunteer output payment.
As the US Ambassador, there are speculations that Lord Mandelson may be in a fixed -term contract.
Dave Penman, Secretary General of the FDA Union, representing senior officers, said that when Lord Mandelson left the government, there may be a “negotiation üzerinde on a financial package.
He said: “As an ambassador, Mandelson will be in a different position than most civil servants, as he serves the pleasure of the prime minister and can be rejected from his role.
“However, this does not mean that normal employment law can be ignored and may be suitable for compensation depending on the nature of the contract and the reasons for dismissal. This is something we have seen with other senior officers in favor of the ministers. There is a negotiation on an exit package.”
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs was approached for comment.
