google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
Hollywood News

Constitutional, religious concerns remain unaddressed in Supreme Court’s interim order: Mirwaiz Umar Farooq

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq said that the abolition of the long -known “Foundation by the User” principle for a long time threatened community institutions based on continuous use even without centuries -old mosques, tombs, cemeteries and deeds. File | Photo Loan: Hindu

On Tuesday, September 16, Jammu and a religious organization in Kashmir Muttahida Majlis-E-Ulema (MMU) president of Kashmir’s chief cleric Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, Waqf, Waqf (wider constitution and religious concerns of religious concerns ”, Waqf (2025), 205.

Mirwaiz said in a statement, “Although there are some provisions, the wider constitutional and religious concerns brought to the agenda by this law remains without adding society to anxious and satisfied.” He said.

The MMU President reiterated that the attempt to dilute Muslim control on these sacred donations or to overcome historical protection were “unacceptable for society” and “contrary to the principles in the Constitution önteen that gives the right to manage their own religious affairs in every religious sect.

“The Supreme Court has provided a temporary partial order with a good indicator. However, many provisions of the law continue to be a serious cause of concern,” he said.

He pointed out that the abolition of the long -recognized “foundation by the user” principle threatening community institutions that function as a vaynon based on continuous use even without centuries -old mosques, tombs, cemeteries and deeds.

“The compulsory requirement of a foundation deed ignores the historical facts that the documents have disappeared or never existed, and ignores the risk of robbing these characteristics of their sacred status.

MMU argued that the change was ında a deliberate movement to weaken and seize rather than protecting foundation properties ”.

MMU, “reactions can be legitimized, real community institutions will suffer. Such measures are discriminatory, because no other religious community is not exposed to interventions similar to internal religious administration,” he said.

MMU asked the Supreme Court to urgently seize the issue for the last hearing and to protect Muslims’ constitutional and religious rights.

“The current protection of the Foundation Law should be restored. The government should give up the underlying of the sacredness of Weqf, and instead, instead of protecting, protecting and developing these donations for the social and religious welfare of future generations,” he added.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button