Telangana Objects to Discussion on Godavari-Banakacherla Link Project in CM-Level Meeting

As a detailed response to the meeting notification of the Ministry, TaLangana named more than one violation of legal provisions, court rewards and environmental cleaning norms and named the discussion about the “early and legally defense” project.

In a letter addressing the secretary, the Ministry of Jal Shakti stated that the project has violated the GODAVARI Court of Inconsistencies (GWDT) award (GWDT) award and the EP reorganization law in 2014.

The Central Water Commission (CWC), the Board of Directors of the Godavari River (GRMB), the Board of Directors of the Krishna River (KRMB), the Apex Council and the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Climate Change (MEEF & CC) lack compulsory gaps.

The preliminary feasibility report (PFR) presented by Andhra Pradesh includes “critical data gaps ında about water presence and technical feasibility.

Moef & CC’s expert assessment committee has already returned the offer by drawing attention to procedural violations and unresolved stinking problems, depending on Polavaram project in Odisha and Chhattisgarh.

The proposed deflection of 200 TMC from Polavaram is unilateral, changes the operating program of the Polavaram project and affects the water rights of TaLangana.

TELANGANA’s demands

The agenda must be revised to postpone the discussion about the connection project until all legal requirements, inter -state consultations and openings are met.

The CWC should reject the preliminary feasibility report and prevent Andhra Pradesh from advance the project or prepare a detailed project report (DPR).

Objections, Polavaram Project Authority, GRMB and CWC, including central agencies, including concerns about the proposal reports come.