Accusations against founder make him a liability
How many more management changes will WiseTech endure before it concludes that founder Richard White’s notoriety outweighs his contribution?
When White’s first personal sex scandal made him famous in late 2024, the company’s share price was severely hit by fears that his position leading the company would be threatened.
Fast forward almost two years, and Tuesday’s announcement that he would be demoted from chairman to executive director caused the WiseTech share price to rise as much as 10.7 percent.
This clearly shows that a turning point has been reached following last month’s reports. Sydney Morning Herald And Australian Financial Review He said he was being investigated by the Australian Federal Police over allegations he exploited a woman’s immigration status and financial insecurity for sex and provided false information on her visa application.
White categorically denies the explosive allegations. But shareholders – even those who do not accept the intricacies of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and have remained loyal to White through previous allegations that he stalked women on social media platform LinkedIn, allegations that he offered personal financial investments in exchange for sex and an ASIC investigation into allegations of insider trading in WiseTech shares – have been forced to concede that the latest accusations are excessive.
The announcement by Raelene Murphy, the company’s new president of WiseTech, made it clear enough that this latest change on the management chessboard was the result of pressure from other shareholders.
He said he was proactively communicating with shareholders and sharing their “strong feedback” with White and the board.
Even White acknowledged that the negative publicity encouraged investors to bet that the company’s share price would fall further — a practice known as short selling.
So White, the entrepreneur who founded the software logistics company, became a liability to WiseTech’s share price rather than the asset he once was.
His continued management at WiseTech is tantamount to White shooting himself in the (financial) foot.
WiseTech has evolved far beyond the startup it was 30 years ago and probably doesn’t need its founder to take an active role in management. It is a mature company that can be managed by professional management.
Would White be doing himself a favor by selling his shares to a level over which he no longer has control, or by selling them entirely? You should think so.
While he sat on the board as a board member, the company’s independent board only killed half the king.
This doesn’t diminish White’s business acumen, or his strategic genius and innovative acumen in taking the company from garage incubator to a $40 billion Australian tech leader at its peak.
But his continued management of the company does no favors for the shareholders, of which he is the largest.
Given that White is an executive director and chief innovation officer, it would be fanciful to suggest that he won’t have a very active and large role in decision-making going forward. Zubin Appoo, WiseTech’s chief executive, isn’t even on the board.
The governance roster at WiseTech has changed multiple times over the last 18 months, with the previous board leaving en masse and White being moved to (eventually in reverse) an advisory position.
If there’s one company that needs stability, it’s WiseTech.
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers big stories, exclusive news and expert insights. Sign up to receive it every weekday morning.
