Anti-woke activist applauds his ‘friends’ at the New York Times for Zohran Mamdani college application ‘scoop’
Right -wing activist And his own style “independent journalist” Christopher Rufo said, “Praised his friends New York Times“After this week reported That he is running to publish a controversial story about how the gray lady is Zohran mamdani Rufo did not want to be a “bucket” because he filled his application.
Just before the weekend of July 4 Times Screamed Paper left a piece New York Mayor’s candidate describes himself as “Asia” as well as “black or African American” in his application for 2009 to Columbia University. Mamdani was born in Indian origin and was born in Uganda.
33 -year -old State Deputy Times Although he does not see himself as black, he sees himself as an ancı an American born in Africa .. In addition, as a 17 -year -old child, he explained that he is trying to represent his complex ethnic and racial history with limited options provided in the form.
Mam Most university practice has no box for Indo-Undanals, so I checked more than one box trying to capture the fullness of my past, Mam Mamdani said he wrote that he was born in Uganda. “Although these boxes are limited, I wanted to reflect who I am a university practice.”
Criticism in general, focusing on the unaware of the part, intensive discussions centered Times’ Framing how Mamdani is defined as a scandal in high school, most of the anger The main source of the story is concentrated.
The New York Times encountered a story about how Zohran Mamdani was defined in a university application form, and the source of the report became the supporter of white superior views. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
As it was initially published, Times The article said that the story revolved around the documents given by a “intermediary known known as Crémieux, which was attacked by Columbia’s computer systems and described only as a rival of academic and positive action”.
However, journalists and researchers of right -wing extremism, quickly pointed This Crémieux is the name of Jordan Lasker, the supplier of white supremacist and eugenic views. Whose public identity It has been known for months. In the midst of the growing epidemic, the article then updated his article to indicate that Crémieux “wrote frequently about IQ and race ,, while the editor Patrick Healy clearly advocated the decision to publish the story and make anonymously anonymous.
Columbia said, “The most important thing here is whether the knowledge is correct and factual – whether it is confirmed by Mr. Mamdani, it is independent and related to the public,” he said. Accepted He said on social media that readers want to learn more about Crémieux was “fair feedback”.
Sunday night, Semafor Media, Times When is the story reported The article ran to publish the story in the afternoon of Thursday afternoon because of the concerns of Rufo.
Semafor said, “Two people familiar with the reporting process were aware that Semafor was aware that the article was working on the story of other journalists, including Rufo,”. There is Rufo It has come to the fore in recent years As a crusade against the critical race theory, DEI policiesAnd “Woke up” ideology.
Semafor said Rufo confirmed that he reported the story. Times The article fell on Thursday and added that he would follow additional details in his lower bag in the coming days.
In the meantime, with a significant effort to adjust the progressives more and reveal the additional reaction to the article on the Mamdani story, RUFO Times He suggested that they were on the same page for the report.
“Kudos for the first time to publish the story to my friends in New York Times”, Conservative Provocateur tweeted Sunday evening.
Democrat also announced that he has tried to represent his complex ethnic and racial history with limited options in form as a 17 -year -old child. (Reuters)
A Times The spokesman refused to comment on Semafor as to whether Rufo’s reporting encouraged the article to progress with his story, and pointed out instead. Healy’s statement to Columbia Journalism Study Explains the reason for publishing the piece.
Between journalists and writers TimesOpinions about the story are divided by re -managing long -standing tensions between left -leaning employees and editorial leaders. Times For example, columnist Jamelle Bouie deleted a few bluesky posts Recently, criticizing the article, one, one of which is Nazi readers or not to say, including multiplying the article, because Times’ Social media guidelines.
At the same time, the senior editors in the article seemed to agree on the decision to publish the piece. Times Journalists showed why the reaction to the story was worth pursuing in the first place.
“The fact that this story provides all the conversation and discussion makes it feel like all the evidence you need to be a legal reporting line” Told to Semafor.
As for the revelation that the article competed against Rufo for the first time to remove the story, several media critics took office because it was manipulated by the right -wing media ecosystem.
“Anyway, if you hit this stupid story with racist criminals in the league with racist criminals for the holiday weekend, because if you’re worried about getting a ‘bucket’ by Chris Rufo, what you say to the world is that you think you think that you are the same as Chris Rufo Published in Bluesky.
“Really. Right story Chris Rufo’s manipulative styles,” Technology columnist Kara Swisher – once hosted a Podcast. New York Times – Reacted to scroCca.
