Anti-zionism v antisemitism. Bondi Beach “F*** Israel” t-shirt man in court battle for freedom of speech

Police now want to drop charges against a man they arrested last year for wearing a F*** Israel F*** Zionism t-shirt. But the man, Andrew Brown, wants his day in court. Michael West reports on a major test for free speech.

Andrew Brown was sitting on a wall on Bondi Beach last November when two police officers approached. Despite making no effort to escape, he was arrested, handcuffed and paraded around Bondi before being put into a paddy wagon and taken to Waverley Police Station.

The station was just upstream from Bondi Junction, but Brown said the journey took 40 minutes, whereupon he was held in a cell for six hours and, despite his refusal, was DNA tested, fingerprinted, photographed and his shirt seized as DNA evidence.

A year later, costs for the state are approaching $1 million and former Mosman Deputy Mayor and businessman Brown has rejected aggressive behavior from the Police prosecutor the charges were dropped. He wants his day in court.

wants to win

and have it written in NSW Case Law that his conduct was a political statement and did not constitute offensive conduct.

The court set aside four full days for the hearing at the Downing Center in Sydney in March. Andrew Brown is likely to involve the Attorney-General along with constitutional experts, solicitors and barristers as he says the NSW Summary Offense charges are overridden by the Constitution and the right to political communication.

Media pile-up by the usual suspects

The result of the arrest and charges was that the Israel lobby and right-wing media (Murdoch’s Daily Telegraph, the pro-Israel Daily Mail, 2GB shock jock Ray Hadley and Israel lobby groups on social media) claimed that despite the overt political nature of Brown’s T-shirt, it was an act of antisemitism.

“I was sitting on the wall in Bondi and doing nothing more dramatic than wearing a shirt. A week ago a group of AJA activists claimed I was intimidating them. They took my photo. Then they said I was a public nuisance. But both days dozens of ordinary people came up to me and thanked me for wearing it.

“I wanted to give you a clear and honest picture of where my case stands regarding the protest shirt that read “Fuck Israel, Fuck Zionism” and why it goes far beyond a simple criminal charge. It has become a test of political discourse, police overreach, and the quiet power of a government agency determined to make an example of someone to appease a powerful lobby.”

NSW Police declined to respond to questions for this story. In the statement made by Police Media, it was said: “We will not be making any comment as the cases remain before the Court at Downing Center on 2 March 2026.”

A test for freedom of expression

When a constitutional issue was raised, Andrew Brown’s lawyers filed a notice under section 78B of the Judiciary Act. This requires that each state and federal Attorney General be notified. This means that the issue cannot be treated as a simple local accusation. Whether the state can use public order laws to control political communications becomes a constitutional issue.

This sits alongside a landmark Federal Court decision by Justice Angus Stewart in 2010. Wertheim – Haddad 2025 FCA 720. Their findings directly address the fundamental problem in Brown’s case.

Judge Stewart drew a clear distinction between attacking Jews as a people and criticizing Israel or Zionism as political entities. He noted that criticism of Israel or Zionism, even when harsh or confrontational, is political in nature and cannot be understood as directed against Jews in general based on race or ethnicity.

He found that this only becomes illegal if someone lumps Jews, Israel, Zionists, and Judaism into one target and attacks the entire group as a single racial or ethnic category. In other words, the law recognizes the difference between political attack on a state or ideology and racial slur.

“This distinction supports the basis of my defense. This was not an attack on Jews as a racial or religious group.”

My shirt was a political statement about a state and a political ideology.

NSW Police’s brutal response

The police’s reaction to his political statement by wearing a T-shirt in public was brutal. After arrest and detention, he was released on bail.

Initial conditions prohibited Brown from entering the entire eastern suburbs.

Yet he lives in Surry Hills, which meant crossing south on South Dowling Street, about 400 meters away, would breach his bail conditions and he would spend 12 months in prison pending his trial; A second bail is unlikely.

“Crossing here would mean arrest and possibly months of detention.” He challenged this in court. Judge Jacqueline Milledge said the ban was absurd.

“If the shirt was offensive at Bondi, it was offensive at Boggabri. He allowed me to go east but forbade me from wearing anything linked to the conflict anywhere in the country, including my own home. We refused, too. He retired that week.

A different judge eventually eased bail conditions, allowing Brown, who runs a business in the Eastern Suburbs, to travel anywhere, but he was not allowed to wear the same shirt in public or he would be in breach of bail.

“A few months ago the police prosecutor contacted my lawyers and said he would drop the two charges of criminal mischief. He had finally seen the video of the alleged intimidation.

The footage was taken from North Bondi Fish looking down the esplanade. In the photo, me and the complainant are more than ten meters apart, talking for approximately eight seconds before continuing to walk.

“No raising the voice. No threats. Nothing resembling intimidation. He also acknowledged that the idea of ​​accusing me of causing the attack on that basis was impossible.”

Brown’s legal team lodged a constitutional challenge to the Police case, arguing that the crime of causing a crime was incompatible with the freedoms enshrined in the Australian Constitution, including political association, political communication and political protest. They argue that a state-level misdemeanor cannot override these freedoms.

The constitutional challenge means every Attorney General in the country, including the Commonwealth, must be notified. All but New South Wales refused to intervene. New South Wales Attorney General Michael Daly chose to oppose the challenge.

The police chose to leave

Police now say they plan to withdraw the two main charges of criminal intent against Brown, leaving a single charge of intimidation. He has been on bail for twelve months; His name appeared in newspapers, talkback shows and online platforms.

Is it a crime to wear a political t-shirt? State v Andrew Brown will take a lot of public resources to decide.

“I would prefer that the matter be heard in open court so that a judge can decide that the shirt is not offensive and that there is no connection between Judaism, Jews, Israel or Zionism that would justify criminalizing political expression.”

Zionism and Judaism

Brown is passionate about this. “Context matters,” he told MWM. “The people who shaped me deeply were my godparents, Jewish Hungarian Holocaust survivors who rebuilt their lives in Sydney after the Second World War. They were not fringe figures. They were central to the structure of the local Sydney Jewish community. They were Frank Lowy’s best friends. They were part of the group that founded the Hakoah Club.

My godfather managed Australia’s Under-23 Olympic football team for decades. They have been respected, admired and loved by people for generations.

I grew up in their world. I went to the synagogue with them. I was at occasional Shabbat dinners at DBs and Twenty One in Double Bay on Friday nights. My childhood was spent in the rhythms of Jewish life and Jewish memory.

I have no problems with the Jewish community. I was shaped accordingly.

“I was taught its stories, its pain, its laughter, its strength. And above all, I was taught the meaning of never again. Not as a slogan. Not as a tribal shield. But as a universal moral imperative. Never again for Jews, yes, but also never again for people everywhere facing ethnic cleansing, state violence, or the slow machine of fascism moving toward them.”

“That’s the lesson my godmother and father passed on to me. That’s the legacy I carry. And that’s why I’m speaking out. It’s my way of honoring them, their courage, and the six million who were killed because the world decided not to see it.”

Against Zionists Keane, Riemer, Kostakidis. Huge test cases for Australia’s freedom of expression

Michael West was founded Michael West Media Focusing on public interest journalism in 2016, particularly the growing power of corporations over democracy. West was formerly a journalist and editor for Fairfax newspapers, a columnist for News Corp and was even once a stockbroker.