Drake-Kendrick Lamar’s epic feud has a day in court

A US judge is not like Kendrick Lamar, but the nature of rap wars and the word of cutting the word game, the other Superstar Drake’s Mega-Hit Diss track that encourages the slander case.

Drake filed a lawsuit against both him and Lamar’s record company Universal Music Group, and said that the company has published and introduced a song that he slanded.

Universal says that lyrics are only an exaggeration in the rap beef tradition and that the label is trying to reject the case.

Judge Jeannette Vargas did not immediately decide on a live hearing on Monday, when the raw creativity of Hip-hop was launched against the stable borders of the federal court.

“Who is the ordinary listener? Is someone to catch all these references?” Vargas wondered loudly and touched on a legal standard that worries how a reasonable person would understand an expression.

“This song is very specialized and nuance.”

No artist attended the hearing.

The case stems from an epic blood feud among one of the two largest stars of Hip -Hop in one of the largest songs of 2024 – Grammys, who won the Grammys Song of the Year, took the most Apple Music streams around the world and helped Super Bowl Halftime show the most watched show so far.

The song of Lamar, which was published while trading an insult track of an insult track, calls Drake, born in Canada, and forces its originality, and it brands Lamar’s home grass in Compton, California, “not like us” and even more widely in West Coast rap.

Not like us, but also Drake’s sex life, “I love you” Young ” – including consequences, including consequences.

Drake’s outfit says that the song is “accusing him of being a sex criminal, participating in pedophilic actions” and more.

The trial, which endangers the concepts of awake justice, blames it not only for damaging Drake’s image, but also for the withdrawal of a security guard at the Toronto house, but also to shoot a security guard.

“This song has created a cultural widespread unlike other rap songs in history,” Drake’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb said. He said.

He argued that Universal had just carried out and participated in a “actual national anthem” that appeal to Hip-Hop fans who only know the background and are accustomed to high-level lyric war.

In the meantime, Universal stressed that it is not part of the exchange of thorns between Drake and Lamar like us.

“The context is the key.”

The case seeks non -specified damages.