Labour’s planned PIP disability cuts are cruel, say two-thirds of UK

75 percent of the UK thinks that the government’s plan to remove personal independent payments (PIP) from long -term disabled ones is “ruthless ..

A new survey assigned by the International Britain with human rights assistance found that the majority of the survey – 54 percent of the polls did not support changes to restrict the number of people demanding PIP.

Under the plans in the controversial new welfare bill, a higher conformity bar will be introduced for the PIP, which is the main disability aid in the UK. PIP is given to support disabled people with extra costs such as higher energy bills or mobility equipment. They claim that this is given points depending on their ability to do certain things such as washing.

The new measures, which will be voted on Tuesday, July 1, will require the demand holders to earn at least eight points in various tasks in order to qualify for daily life allowance. In an concession to workers’ deputies, Liz Kendall was exempted from these new requirements of current PIP plaintiffs.

A savannah survey of 2.080 people, mainly compared to age and region, found that 69 percent of the participants would prefer to tax the super -rich instead of reducing the Social Security of the United Kingdom. 59 percent also said that the cutting of the PIP will not help get more people get a job.

Participants living in the North West were the ones who had the highest probability of labeling the deductions as “ruthless ında – 82 percent of people agreed to explain. This closely followed 80 percent of the people in the South East.

The poll is in front of a Crunch vote in Parliament on Tuesday. After more than 120 deputies decided to vote against it, the government conquered Rebel Labor MPs through the welfare law.

Jen Clark from the International Amnesty International said: “The public’s message is open: Poverty is a political choice and this government is dangerous to choose poverty and party policies on human rights.

“In all age groups, in the background and political belief, people acknowledge that it is ruthless to cut the Pip and that they can see it because they have these suggestions – unfair, unnecessary and unfair.”

Disability also criticized the scope of philanthropy, the planned changes, the strategy manager, James Taylor, accused the government of exposing the government to a “two -layer system ğı that people with disabilities still have a“ two -layer system ”.

The authority added: “The government should now change the route about this disaster cuts”.

A Government Spokesman said: “We offer one of the biggest packages of welfare reforms in a generation – the scrap of the assessment of work capability, to re -balance the universal loan and to invest in private employment support.

“Protecting people is a principle that we will never compromise, so we offer a long -lasting and significant change that puts the welfare system on sustainable foundations, so that the security network will always be there for those who need it.”