Lessons from the history of rebellions in AIADMK and DMK

In the ongoing public discourse on convulsions in AIADMK, many of them should not follow the example of the party secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami, the predecessor Jayalithaa and the founder of the organization, MG Ramachandran.

In this context, after a period of separation triggered by bitter criticism, references to the former ministers re -positioned by MGR and Jayalithaa respectively are given references to SD Somasundaram (SDS) and K. Kalimuthu.

Similarly, if it was to take a look at the history of the DMK, the former president of the party, M. Karunidhi, had many examples of an organization that made a few leading personality, including Sathiavani Muthu and Nanjil K. Manoharan.

SDS ‘MGR, Spat with Jayalithaa

SDS was one of those who came out of the DMK when the MGR formed AIADMK in 1972. He often said: “I work with him to grow and the growth of AIADMK.” After MGR became revenue minister in the cabinet for six years, the SDS developed in July 1984 in several issues such as entry test to accept the Prime Minister and Professional College and Sri Lankalı Tamils ​​issues.

In expressing his views on these issues, he was a “ruthless blunt .. Hindu It was reported on July 10, 1984. Then the portfolio was changed from income to food. When these differences were asked at a press conference in Tiruchi, “Why should I resign from the party or quit?” The SDS called himself a “strict discipline ve and fulfilled his work with“ sincerity and honesty ”as a minister.

At the same time, some regional units of AIADMK organized black flag performances against him and decided to boycott him. He was one of the painful critics of Jayalithaa (later syllabed Jayalitha), the party’s propaganda secretary and a member of Parliament (Rajya Sabha). At one stage he accused him of being a “actual prime minister .. This newspaper reported on August 28, 1984, although it was more than two months since the Prime Minister’s oath, he trained his weapons on the MGR, claiming that nothing has been done to eliminate corruption and remove the “bootleggers and looters from the party.

In addition, MG’s National Conference regime in Jammu and Kashmir came to the Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, whom MG re -established for the dismissal of the NT Rama Rao Ministry in Andhra Pradesh, which occurred within a month. When AIADMK’s ruler came together in Chennai on September 1, the SDS remained predictable and advised the party’s decision -making body to be removed. After being removed from the cabinet and the party, three legislators followed him. The reaction to his dismissal was: ım I am happy to be out of the cabinet chaired by a corrupt prime minister. ”

Then he made a party – Namadhu Kazhagam. During the 1984 Delik Sabha and the parliamentary surveys in the state, he initially tried to make an election agreement with DMK, but Karunanidhi was still. This forced him to go alone, and his candidates took part in 150 parliamentary elections and 15 Lok Sabha election zones. The party’s performance was disaster. In the hands of a less known AIADMK candidate, the home election area suffered a humiliating defeat in Pattukkottaii and lost the deposit.

Jayalithaa and SD Somasundaram | Photo Loan: Hindu Archives

After a period of recession in his political activities, SDS took a mockery to Raj Bhavan in April 1986 and by calling the constitution of an investigation commission against the AIADMK regime of an investigation commission by the Union Government, commercial taxes, forests and cooperation, calling the constitution of an investigation commission. At that time, MGR’s health failed and visited the United States periodically for controls.

In November that year, SDS surprised everyone when he called the Prime Minister at the Ramavaram residence and returned to AIADMK a few days later. Ironically, he later became a key member of the Jayalithaa camp at the party, and in 1989 he failed from Thiruverambur as AIADMK (Jayalithaa). In 1991, he once again became the Minister of Revenue, and his portfolio held his portfolio five years before returning to Jayalithaa.

Kalimuthu vs jayalithaa

Like Kalimuthu, SDS, in the second half of the 1980s, Dravidian could not compromise with the rise of Jayalithaa in Major. The former minister was one of the well -known feeders with Rm Veherappan. In 1985, when the MGR had a short break of Jayalithaa, there were rumors that when he made a propaganda secretary again and that Kalimuthu, who was the minister in the MGR cabinet between 1977-86, could even be taken to the cabinet. According to a report India today (November 30, 1985): “Kalimuthu is gathering MLA’s signatures in a statement that opposes Jayalitha’s possible induction to the cabinet and lists the so -called mistakes during the healing of MGR in New York earlier this year.”

K. Kalimuthu. File | Photo Loan: Hindu Archives

During the division in AIADMK after the death of MGR, Janaki was naturally with the Ramachandran fraction. In the January 1989 Assembly survey, he came fourth in the Fourth and could not maintain his deposit. When the two groups later came together, it was one of the founders that opposed the union and founded AIADMK (MGR). However, in May, later in that year, in the general elections, Sivakasi Lok Sabha chose to work under Jayalithaa, who nominated for the election zone. About a year later, despite leaving AIADMK, he returned and in 2001 he became the speaker of the Assembly.

The rebellion of Sathiavani Muthu

In the DMK, in 1974, Prime Minister Karunidhi appeared to reinforce his position after the MGR leaving the party in October 1972, and Harijan Welfare (called Adi-saterah and tribal welfare in the 1970s), Minister Sathiavani Muthu returned to him. In the floor of the parliament, the accusations against the authorities for not cooperating with the prosperous measures for the planned castes stunned everyone by leveling. He also claimed that the funds designed for the development of SCs were used to promote the welfare of retrospective classes. The Prime Minister initially tried to solve the differences with him by searching for details from him and providing action against the public officials. But he repeated his criticism and was left in May that year. Mouthu continued to swim a party before merging with AIADMK. He even wrote a broadcast that strongly criticizes Karunanidhi.

Muthu was elected to Rajya Sabha, and when the MGR supported the separation fraction of the separation fraction that led Janata, ruled by Charan Singh in 1979, he represented him and A. Bala Pajanor as the representatives of the short -lived regime. Muthu’s attempt to enter the parliament after an eight -year gap during the 1984 Assembly survey was not successful because he lost in Perrambur. In 1989, before returning to the DMK, Janaki was with Ramachandran during the division of the party.

Sathiavani Muthu | Photo Loan: Hindu Archives

The exit and re -entry of Najil Manoharan

Four years later, Najil K. Manoharan, who was the finance minister in the MGR’s first cabinet (1977-80) and later returned to the DMK to express his views against Karunanidhi. In the second half of June 1993, Manoharan, Deputy Secretary General of the DMK at that time, Dravid Major, published a poem in a pro -DMK Tamil and aimed to lead the party leadership. Daily, later, he had another poem that indirectly criticizing Manoharan, who later rejected that he insulted Karunanidhi. It didn’t mean the DMK chief in poetry. He and Mr. Karunanidhi had mutual love and love, and his friendships were “for more than twenty years .. Hindu It was reported on June 25, 1993.

However, party leadership felt “sufficient ve and decided to dismiss it. The trigger for Manoharan’s poem was apparently that DMK Trust did not take part in the Board of Trustees. Nevertheless, in a few days, Manoharan regretted and sent a letter to the party that requested a re -acceptance.

Nangeil K. Manoharan | Photo Loan: Hindu Archives

The party was also in the middle of the uneasiness between Karunidhi, one of the leading deputies of the party, and Vaiko (then known as V. Gopalsamy). Manoharan’s “U-Dönüşü” was said to challenge Mr. Vaiko for the deportation of the deportation because he could not be canceled in many regional secretaries. Five months later, Mr. Vaiko pioneered a rebellion against Karunanidhi, while Manoharan was taken back to the party. Later, he accused Prime Minister Jayalithaa of his resistance to Mr. Vaiko’s resistance to the President of the DMK, and this newspaper reported on 5 December 1993. In May 1996, he was included in the cabinet led by Manoran Karunanidhi and died four years later in the harness film.

However, an experienced member of AIADMK, who knows the history of the two Dravid party, now claims that the groups headed by former leaders O. Panneerselvam, VK Sasikala and TTV Dhinakaran do not seem positively prone under Palaniswami’s leadership. Nevertheless, a long -standing member of AIADMK, which is currently with Mr. Panneerselvam, says that the leader of the group is ready to hand in hand in hand in hand. Both the past and current key leaders of AIADMK seem to have not yet appreciated the importance of the lessons of the past.