Centre on the defensive over Congress’s accusations of ‘subverting’ Forest Act
Former Minister of Environment Jairam Ramesh, Narendra Modi-lider within the scope of the government’s implementation of the implementation of the Forest Rights Law hours after the charges, the Union of Environment, the Ministry of Environment, such references, such references, “the realities and communities, India’s green cover and communities, said that the protection of the regions in question,” he said.
“For the benefit of India’s struggle for a greener future, individuals must give up the deliberate misinformation and selective quotation of problems. Moefcc is not only increasing the green cover of the country, but also unprecedented initiatives to ensure sustainability for dependent communities,” he said.
The statement of the Ministry came to X, the social media platform, which referred to a letter sent to the Prime Minister’s Office by more than 150 forest rights and civil society groups around the country, the Secretary General of the Congress, which is also the Secretary General of the Congress.
Legal Unhappy Data
Civil Society groups, in their letters dated June 28, the Indian Forest State Report 2023, Environmental Minister Bhupender YADAV in a media interview in a media interview allegedly repeated in a media interview, said the loss of forest cover was misleading. In June 2024, approximately 65,000 families of the Tiger Reserves released and the Ministry claimed that the Parliament offered “legally unbearable” data to the Parliamentary Fora and the National Green Court. In addition, the 2023 amendments made in the Forestry (Protection) Law in 1980 were “Bulduzer through Parliament ve and Van Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan rules 2023,” the amount and quality of forests adversely affect the amount and quality “claimed.
In a detailed article, the environment, forests and climate change that rejects these claims, “The expression of the environment, forest and climate change quoted on social media was represented in a fragmented way and completely out of the context.” He said.
The Ministry said that the statement of Mr. Yadav in the media meeting, “The deterioration in some forest areas was observed for various reasons,“ the net increase in the forest cover in the country ”is a reference.
The Minister’s testimony was “increasing the forest cover and stopping the deterioration of forests through the active participation of the local community ve and also that this“ context was completely weakened, ignored and represented incorrectly ”.
GOVT.
Mr. Ramesh said in his position that the problems brought to the agenda by civil society groups have “basic importance ve and“ the registry of the modern government did not inspire the trust that these issues would be discussed and discussed with those who were forced to bring their attention to them.
“Moefcc’s allegations that Moefcc offers legally unacceptable data on rape in different forums is completely wrong, unfounded and does not have any value,” he said. He continued to say that the evacuation point of the families from the Tiger reserves was “lack of merit and misrepresentation ve and that he referred to the implementation as“ voluntary relocation yönetically managed by the relevant laws and procedures.
The Ministry continued to say that the recently published Indian Forest Study report has recorded “a significant increase in forest and tree cover”, which the participation of the communities was “thought -provoking”. The Ministry said, ı The inference issued is contrary to the real position and there is no merit completely. ”
Upon the allegations of Forest Protection Law and the allegations of amendments made in the subsequent rules, the government said that their provisions were made without “in -depth knowledge and understanding”. He insisted that the amendment was brought to “according to determined constitutional processes” and “necessary parliamentary procedures ..
The ministry also added that their “sincere efforts üzerinde were ignored in order to include community members in the forest administration, and in Dudhwa Tiger Reserve (UP) Tharu Tribal and Soliga Tribals in Karnataka were both“ very good response ”. He added that the government is determined to provide “prosperity and active participation ından in the forest management by using“ traditional knowledge and wisdom ”.
Published – 04 July 2025 12:58
