Epping migrant hotel set to CLOSE after council wins legal battle for temporary injunction, despite Home Office claiming it would breach asylum seekers’ human rights

Migrants will be removed from a controversial shelter after the decision to close a Council to a Council.

The Council leaders won the first stage of their wars on EPPING, Bell Hotel in ESSEX, and some of them, including those who are severe, on the planning permission to plan in planning of anti -immigrant protests.

The demonstrations were fired when an immigrant living in the hotel was accused of a series of sexual crimes, including a 14 -year -old girl.

The EPPING Forest Region Council took a temporary precautionary measures by the Supreme Court in London today.

It came after trying to prevent legal difficulties by claiming that the closing of the home office would cause ‘acute challenges’ and violating the ‘basic human rights’ of asylum seekers.

Ministers will now be afraid that other parts of the country will try similar tactics to make non -popular immigrant hotels shutting up.

Edward Brown KC, the Ministry of the Interior ‘Supreme Court’ more violent protests for the risk of a driving force to carry out the risk of the risk of a driving task, ‘he said.

The movement, asylum seekers to avoid violating human rights’ legal duty ‘will intervene to a great extent’ he said.

The lawyer added: ‘The balance of convenience can never support a process of behavior that creates the risk of interfering with basic human rights.

“If the precautionary measure is given by the court, it will significantly affect the legal duties of the Minister of the Interior.

‘Local authority must actually take some into consideration for the wider public interest in this application.’

Authorized, precautionary precautionary proposal ’causes certain acute challenges in the present date’ added.

Shadow Interior Minister Chris Philp, a precautionary precautionary decision ‘EPPING people’ a moment of relaxation ‘described.

The Conservative MP said: ‘The residents should never have to fight their own governments to feel safe in their own towns.

‘Local residents have the right to feel safe in their own streets and the right to object when they are treated as a dumping area.’

The craftsmanship accused of deciding to tear the deterrers fulfilled by the conservatives, such as Rwanda asylum program.

Frontbencher, ‘Conservatives will remove almost all illegal arrival and the towns such as EPPING will never go into this position again,’ ‘he added.

The Ministry of Interior was not represented at a previous hearing on Friday.

Today, however, he wanted the department to allow Mr. Justice Eyre to intervene, and he would decide whether the precautionary measure would be given.

Philip Coppel KC for the EPPING Forest Region Council, the Ministry of the Interior ‘request is’ a complete inconclusive application in a completely fruitless way’, he said.

The Minister added that the department knew the proposal of precautionary precaution last week, but ‘sitting in their hands’.

The precautionary measure means that the hotel owner Somani Hotels Limited should stop housing asylum seekers on the field by September 12 – a slightly longer time scale.

Protesters are gathered outside the Bell Hotel in EPPING, ESSEX on July 31st.

The EPPING Forest Region Council takes a precautionary measures in the Supreme Court in London to stop the former Bell Hotel in EPPING, where immigrants belong to Somani Hotels Ltd.

A series of protests have taken place since the arrest of an asylum seeker for three alleged crime and led to 28 arrests

Apart from the hotel, it comes after a series of protests in recent weeks.

A resident at the hotel, 41 -year -old Hadush Kebatu from Ethiopia was accused of sexual assault, harassment and encouraging a girl to participate in sexual activity.

It was claimed that the events were within two days a week after the 41 -year -old child came to England by boat.

The EPPING Forest Region Council requested a temporary precautionary measures that stopped the hosting of immigrants at Bell Hotel in EPPING after the protests.

Defending Raphael Pigott, said to a hearing at the Colchester Magistrate Court on 17 July: ‘I think he is here as a refugee or asylum seeker and that he came to a unofficial boat.’

Mr. Kebatu allegedly trying to kiss a female student while eating pizza near a busy street, and the next day, he tried to kiss an adult near a fish and chipset in the city center and put his hand on his leg ‘beautiful’.

Then he met the girl again and tried to kiss her, a court was told.

Mr. Kebatu rejected the crimes and in custody.

A second man who lives in the hotel, Syrian national Muhammad Sharwarq, was accused of seven crimes separately.

A series of protests have been carried out outside the hotel since the alleged events.

Last month, there was violence outside the building after the ‘anti -immigration’ campaigns ‘anti -racist’ demonstrators had clashed with demonstrators.

While the activists were fighting on the streets, they fought to include the police chaos.

Since then, twenty -eight people have been arrested for disorder and 16 of them have been accused.

Police chiefs described the unrest in the bag as another disorder in the summer as ‘signal flare’.

Protests led to a strong existence of a strong policing at the hotel, 28 demonstrators TA series events.

At a hearing on Friday, the Council said that the housing of the asylum seekers on the property has become a ‘much serious problem’.

For the Council, lawyers claimed that Somani hotels have violated the planning rules because the site is not used for the purpose of a hotel and said that it was ‘an overwhelming case for a precautionary measure decision’.

Somani hotels, lawyers in the court in London ‘a ruthless’ precautionary measure decision’ asylum seekers’ difficulty ‘will cause the claim that the claim.

They added that ‘political views’ is not a basis for taking a precautionary measure.

They also said that the contracts hosting asylum seekers were only a ‘financial life line’ for the hotel, which was just a percentage full of customers who paid in August 2022.

For the Council, the trial on Friday, Philip Coppel KC, said: ‘EPPING Forest Region Council is taking a precautionary measures to this court because it is a very serious problem.

“ A problem of control; It is a problem that creates great concern for those living in the region.

‘Catalyst, Bell Hotel’s use of asylum seekers to be used as an increase in community tension.

‘The problem was caused by the defendant because of a violation of planning control.’

The site continued that ‘there is no more hotels for asylum seekers than a Borontal for asylum seekers’ and that Somani hotels did not have the courage to search for legal use’ and ‘will solve the issue in their favor’.

Mr. Coppel also referred to the sexual assault of the young girl and said that several schools were in the nearby region.

He said: ‘It is unacceptable that such things continue in such a school that has no precaution to stop a repetition.

‘It couldn’t be worse than that.’

Another factor in favor of giving precautionary measures will eliminate the catalyst for severe protests in public places.

The lawyer added: ‘To allow the status quo to continue is completely unacceptable, provides a feeding area for restlessness.’

Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels, said the alleged planning violation is not ‘ugly’ and that the use of the council was hidden from them.

The lawyer told the court that the hotel had previously contained asylum seekers from 2020 to 2021 and from 2022 to 2024 and that the Council never started official implementation processes against this use ‘.

He said that the company had applied for planning permission for ‘temporary use’ in February 2023, but then withdrew until April 2024.

Later, asylum seekers began to be re-placed in Bell Hotel in April 2025, and Mr. Riley-Smith said that a planning application was not made by receiving advice from the home office ‘.

The lawyer, who addressed the public protests in EPPING, said: ‘The court should keep in mind that these are recognized by the plaintiff – they have spread beyond the locals who can have a wider group with more strategic national and ideological purposes about their regions.

‘Fears about the increase in crime associated with asylum seekers or a danger for schools are common, but this does not make them well established.

‘At the same time, it is a dangerous precedent that justifies the planning measures of protests.’