Everyone in Canberra agrees action is needed on AI. But what to do and how? And at what cost? | Australian politics

Although Australia assigns another process of how to deal with artificial intelligence, the worker government will have to stop working soon and make key decisions about how to quickly regulate balloon technology.

Like many regulation questions in the field of technology-16-year-old social media prohibition, Peta Murphy’s gambling advertisement report long-time delayed response and news bargaining encouragement-a move, at least half of the participants in the discussion is likely to raise their hackling.

The government finds that the extraordinary risks of trade unions, large technology companies and major technology companies that are willing to carved, and the extraordinary Australians of the major Australians who are afraid of the cutting of large areas from risky labor in the connection of the work groups that itch for productivity gains.

A week after Jim Chalmers’s Economic Reform Summit, we are not much closer to knowing where the Albanian government should be covered by the need for a new legislation.

Industry Minister Tim Ayres controls a national AI talent plan that is expected by the end of the year; A “emptiness analysis” described as a result of the reform round table is the review of existing processes in the fields of health, privacy, copyright and online safety. Other studies focus on international forums to help them include AI in public service, increase investment in data centers, and to shape the frameworks of training and global rules for artificial intelligence skills.

The problem is bleeding almost every portfolio and the government says he wants to spend time to do it right. However, we know that there are extensive and various opinions among Labor MPs, and some of them rely on the existing rules or constitute a new AI law to achieve decisions about what the government will do.

Exactly to the diversity in the head What To do, many are eager to see Something It helps Australia to seize the moment and prevent the wave, or at least it should not be caught by hitting us.

Pointing out the efforts of the government to solve the negative effects of social media with the plans to compensate for under the age of 16 and the media organizations of the government, some of the labor force sources said that fast-moving and generation technology should be arranged properly from the beginning.

However, the comments of various participants from the round table meeting, almost the only thing they could accept about AI, some positive and some negativity. The Chalmers gave an uncertain response to the agreement on the meeting on the meeting on the meeting.

Almost every workplace in the country will have to find out how to respond to artificial intelligence. It’s not an easy job. Industries will be reshaped from white -collar workers to public officials from mechanics and public officials, and the face will change forever. It is very important to do correctly, maximize the benefits and minimize negatives. You don’t have a second chance to remove Genie out of the bottle.

It is a intimidating task for any government. However, the closest conclusion from the Reform Round Desk was a plan to “accelerate work” in the national plan and to make a “gap analysis ğı that Chalmers said whether the government would maintain a new inclusive law or to determine the existing rules.

The previous Minister of Industry and Science Ed Husic was questioned by some for establishing a few investigations on artificial intelligence and not bored of an action; He called for an independent AI law. However, while every major technology company competes to establish new AI models, the government remains in the review mode.

Perhaps a new Parliamentary Committee will help to constantly review the protean technology – but it is more urgent to establish a wider government.

Ayres is said to focus on capturing Ai Boon’s benefits, benefiting from countless opportunities and not missing the boat. The AI ​​talent plan has three basic poles: capturing economic opportunities, sharing the benefits of new technology, and security problems.

The gap analysis described after the round table is slightly more fluent. Anyone who predicts how long to decide whether a new law is necessary.

However, the key players require change.

How to deal with copyright problems for major learning models and whether the government will be with the technology giants seeking exemption from “data mining” or whether the art, creative and media companies that demand compensation or licensing agreements continue; A potential breakthrough between the trade unions and the technology council mocked at the summit will still be fruit.

Trade unions still encourage protection for workers and guarantee shared benefits.

The government may have been stuck between seeing a wider adoption as a major productivity measures, withdrawing an economic opportunity and technology capital in data centers, and protecting its employees and the work they produce.

Where the Labor Party comes to artificial intelligence, it will be a decisive issue for years for the government. It is a difficult activity to take advantage of productivity gains, to protect workers and to hold a cover to a potentially dangerous technology – but it will take years to find out whether the investigation is a correct and prudent way or to stand on the beach to discuss the tidal wave.