Fears of mass unrest after judges revoke ban on housing migrants at protest-hit Epping hotel
Judges are supported for protests after prohibiting housing asylum seekers at an EPPING hotel that is uncomfortable with unrest.
The Judges of the Court of Appeal decided that the closure of Bell Hotel in EPPING, ESSEX will have “obvious results ve in the government’s duty to host asylum seekers, and if other councils are allowed, they would“ encourage similar legal action.
The EPPING Forest Region Council (EFDC) decided to take a precautionary measure against the use of the hotel for immigrants after a series of violent protests fired by the arrest of a resident against a settled sexual crimes.
However, on Friday, a definite win for the Ministry of the Interior, the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court judge Adalet Eyre’nin, when the precautionary measure decided to make a series of mistakes, which made all of the 138 asylum seekers were removed until September 12th.
Essex police, after the decision was made in the hotel and the government has a significant policing plan in case of more unrest. Meanwhile, Arman Mathieson, Vice President of Gloucestershire Police, said that he was “well prepared” for rallies in the region of power.
Anti -Rakism against the protesters were preparing to take action against anti -immigrant rallies planned in 23 places throughout England at the weekend.
Cardiff, Oldham, Nottingham, Portsmouth, Gloucester, Canary Wharf and Crawley are planned for Cheshunt, Bournemouth and Chichester on Friday evening and on Saturdays and Sundays.
EFDC leader Chris Whitbread called on the decision to be calm following the decision: “There were peaceful protests and there were unpleasant protests outside the hotel. You saw it as part of our case, but I just wanted the residents to be calm.” “He’s really worried about the future of the town,” he said.
The Council promised to continue its legal struggle with the last precautionary measure in October. He called the government to “take responsibility for events in EPPING within the last six weeks”.
Interior Minister Dame Angela Eagle said that the ministers are trying to appeal the precautionary measure, so that the hotels can “come out in controlled and regularly”. However, Shadow Interior Minister Chris Philp accused the Labor Party of ı use the courts against the British people ”.
TORY leader Kemi Badenoch called on conservative councils to continue to take similar measures against hotels in their regions and confirmed that many of them would do legal action.
Nigel Farage from the reform responded to the news: illegal illegal immigrants have more rights than the British under Starmer ”.
In the Court of Interior, the Minister of the Interior argued that the EPPING HOTEL should not stop the conflict of precautionary measures, because otherwise he would disrupt his legal duty to host vulnerable asylum seekers who could be poor.
In written arguments, the Ministry of the Interior said that “the relevant public interests in the game are not equal”, that the government is trying to compare the deduction in EPPING with a wider effect on the need to host asylum seekers.
In his decisions, Lord Justice Bean, Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb said that “about the right hierarchy” comparison is not “attractive”.
However, the Supreme Judge Adalet judge Adalet admitted that Eyre did not think of the important practical difficulty of changing a large number of asylum seekers in a short time ”.
Somani Hotels Ltd, the owner of Bell Hotel, said that “was caught in the midst of a much wider discussion about the treatment of asylum seekers” and “everyone who is associated with Bell Hotel was left alone to continue to support the asylum plans as much as possible”.
EFDC Tory Assembly Member Shane Yerrell, the government “shame on their heads,” he said.
The lawyers of the home office trying to remove the ban, the maintenance of the precautionary measure will risk more irregularity, he said. The Ministry of the Interior said, “The existing asylum property is subject to incredibly high demand” and the loss of 152 bedrooms would lead to “important difficulties ..
Staffordshire District Council, which threatened to make a similar legal action on the use of hotels that host asylum seekers, said that the decision of Friday’s decision on Friday “ignores the impact on communities and services in our district and our country.”
The latest home office data shows that it is 32,059 asylum seekers in the UK hotels until the end of June.
This rose from 29,585 at the same point a year ago, when conservatives were still in power, but at the end of March, 32,345 figures fell slightly.
The objection made by the hotel owners and the Ministry of Interior comes the same week as Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, who lives at the hotel, is accused of sexual assault on a 14 -year -old girl last month.
Rejecting the charges, Mr. Kebatu said to a court on Wednesday because he did not try to kiss the girl because he was not a wild animal ”. The Colchester Magistrates ‘Court told the Magistrates’ Court only to say hello to his friends at ESSEX, and that he was nothing else because he was “worried about my asylum case”.
Another man living on the site, the Syrian national Muhammad Sharwarq was accused of seven crimes separately, and several other men were accused of irregularity except for the hotel.
Police arrested 25 people in the protests in EPPING Hotel and 16 were accused of criminal offenses.
The EPPING Forest Zone Council will have another opportunity to challenge the use of Bell Hotel for asylum seekers at a full hearing listed for mid -October.
