google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
USA

Fed officials see rate hike ahead if inflation stays elevated, minutes show

US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell attends a press conference on April 29, 2026 in Washington, DC, USA.

Li Rui | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

WASHINGTON — A majority of Fed officials predicted at their last meeting that interest rate hikes would be necessary if the Iran war continued to worsen inflation, according to minutes released Wednesday.

Although the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee voted once again to keep the benchmark interest rate between 3.5 percent and 3.75 percent, the meeting featured four “no” votes, the highest number since 1992, and a clearly growing level of disagreement over where policy should go.

The issue was the impact of the Iran war on prices and how this would be reflected in monetary policy. Officials differed on how long the impact of the war would last and whether the post-meeting statement would continue to reflect a bias towards a rate cut as the next step.

While some meeting participants said a rate cut would be appropriate when it became clear that inflation had returned to the Fed’s 2% target or that the labor market had weakened, “but the majority of participants emphasized that some policy tightening would likely be appropriate if inflation remained consistently above 2 percent.”

Three of the four “no” votes came from regional leaders who argued that policymakers should keep increase options open in an environment where inflation is rising. The group agreed that benchmark interest-bearing funds rates should be kept steady but objected to the inclusion of language referring to “additional adjustments” to rates. It is widely believed that the phrase means that the next move will be a disruption.

“Many participants indicated in the post-meeting statement that they would prefer to have language removed that suggested that bias had been mitigated regarding the likely direction of the Committee’s future interest rate decisions,” the minutes said.

However, since it did not constitute a “very” majority, as the Fed puts it, the statement remained in the statement.

Although officials debated how long the impact on inflation would last, they generally agreed that the Iran dispute would have “significant consequences” for the Fed as it pursues its dual goals of full employment and stable prices.

“The vast majority of respondents noted an increasing risk that inflation would take longer to return to the Committee’s 2 percent target than they had previously expected,” the document said. The statement was included.

Warsh’s challenge

The meeting took place against an interesting backdrop: This was the last time Jerome Powell chaired the committee, and this came amid rising inflationary pressures resulting mainly from the war as well as other factors that made officials cautious about the future of policy.

Former Gov. Kevin Warsh is now taking over after a long campaign that included some 11 candidates. President Donald Trump singled out Warsh and made clear that he expected the Fed to lower interest rates.

But market pricing has pointed to a higher likelihood that the committee’s next move will be a hike in late 2026 or early 2027.

Inflation was heading toward the Fed’s 2% target through 2025 and earlier this year. But the war changed the dynamic, with rising energy prices pushing most measures of inflation above 3%.

Policymakers often view supply shocks, such as the rise in oil, as temporary. But even core inflation, which excludes food and energy, is rising. Goldman Sachs predicts the Fed will announce an annual rate of 3.3% in April, when its key inflation forecast measure is released next week.

Warsh’s challenge, then, will be to convince his colleagues that improvements in productivity led by AI developments will be disinflationary and counteract the immediate effects of higher energy costs.

One of those colleagues will be Powell himself, who has chosen to remain on the Board. Powell has two years left in his term, and while he said in April that he would remain in office “for a period to be determined,” he reiterated his previous statement that he would remain until “this investigation is fully concluded.” No other Fed chairman has remained on the board in nearly 80 years.

Select CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a beat from the most trusted name in business news.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button