Starmer and Macron plead for patience in an impatient world

French president and the Prime Minister’s close -up was to watch the two men under Cosh, to fight because they saw the essence of their political beliefs in the opinion polls.

It is based on this – how do Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron sue for seeing patience, nuances, subtleties and virtues in the era of impatience in the repetitive failures of the high office perceived in the high office?

At the news conference, there were only two chair and two speakers hosted by leaders, but the other two parties flew into the air.

Reform Britain and national rally, Jordan Bardella and Marine Le Pen’s party were never clearly stated. It wasn’t their leaders. However, it was repeatedly mentioned indirectly.

The two parties on both sides of the channel are not the same, but now they have the same capacity to scare the lives of the ruling people.

They do this to communicate with an anti -organization in a simple language and to disappoint with traditional political classes. Quite combination.

“While working hard for the return agreement, others take photos of the problem.” He said.

Who could think of probably?

“It’s politics.

The reform leader Nigel Farage spent the morning on the British channel from GB News on a boat on a British channel and saw this new agreement between Paris and London as a humiliation for England.

He says that Britain should abandon the European Convention on Human Rights, and that many people have made a wider claim because he thinks that he was stuck by embracing an unusual, noisy, noisy party. Why doesn’t he go into discussion after the last few years.

President Macron made similar claims to the Prime Minister who confronted similar discussions from the national rally.

The President argued that there is a need to recognize the “complexity of the world” and to avoid what he deems “attraction” for some of whom he describes as “populists”.

As I wrote Here The last day, the latest evidence we have seen from the Prime Minister’s changing argument – a sharp criticism of Farage and what Sir Keir believes in the next election is one of the two on Downing Street.

And today and in the coming years, a large part of the argument between the two will be on small boat crossings.

The new survey for Portland Communications shows that 26% of Labour voters in the last year’s general elections were reform, and if the number of small boat transitions decreases, it is more likely that it is more likely to return to the Worker.

The same voting says that the ten voters with reform tendency have enough time to improve something through the eighth year.

And almost half of all voters see Nigel Farage as the leading leader.

This is an idea of ​​the challenge for the prime minister and potentially the opportunity.

In the opposite age, in the hope of patience, but to claim that his opponent offers a wrong promise.

Hope that the government’s arms can deliver over time. Let’s see.

One last thought.

This week, I spoke specially to the senior figures in both the Labor Party and the Conservative Party, which presented the same reflections on how to come out of the next few years.

The reform of the person I am talking about will not surprise you that you do not want to see that England has won the general election.

Both admitted that this was a real possibility, but both had a deep concern.

Both reflected that many of the voters concluded last year that conservatives failed and many of the voters concluded this year, or soon worked as workers’ failed.

The reform can present in a way that its predecessors are never directed.

But what happens, if Nigel is going to win and then thought to fail, he thought about the two people I was talking about?

Where are they, and what political would the country return?