Gorsuch says ideological divides on Supreme Court come down to ‘how you read law,’ not politics
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch said that differences between his colleagues on the high court often have less to do with policy than different approaches to constitutional interpretation; This dynamic, he said, affects both the court’s decisions and its internal relations.
“This has nothing to do with politics,” Gorsuch said in a recent interview on Fox News Digital. “It has something to do with it [with] How do you study law? Interpretive methodologies.”
Gorsuch nominated by the President Donald Trump In 2017, he described himself as a “textologist”, stating that his approach focuses on interpreting legal texts according to the ordinary meaning of the words as they are written. philosophy It is linked to originalism, or the view that the Constitution should be interpreted according to its original public meaning at the time it was adopted.
Other judges have different interpretations, including some that allow interpretations to change over time. Gorsuch emphasized that the differences, although important, are not personal in nature.
Judge Thomas Nadir Warns in Public Address that Progressivism Is a Threat to America
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch speaks at the Reagan Library in Simi Valley, California, on May 5, 2026.
(Getty Images)
“At the end of the day, you’re trying to get to the right answer under the law,” he said, adding that disagreement is an expected and healthy part of the process.
His remarks come as the federal judiciary and members of the Supreme Court have come under increasing scrutiny in recent years, including from Trump and his allies who have criticized the courts for interfering with what they see as the duties of the executive branch.
Trump criticized this situation on Truth Social last month Supreme CourtBecause the Conservative majority showed “little loyalty” to him when they blocked the so-called “Emancipation Day” tariffs in February.
He also suggested they could block a presidential executive order aimed at ending so-called “birthright citizenship” in the United States.
“Some ‘Republican’ judges have become weak, stupid and evil; they have completely violated what they ‘so-called’ stand for,” Trump said.
President Donald Trump greets Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts as he arrives to address the 2025 joint session of Congress.
He contrasted this with the liberal justices on the court, who Trump said “stick together like glue, completely loyal to the people and ideology that got them there.”
Gorsuch, for his part, emphasized that the justices often share much common ground, even if their interpretations of the Constitution lead them to reach different conclusions.
This approach, he suggested, was also reflected in the way judges worked together behind closed doors; here collaboration and debate were central to the high court’s fulfillment of its constitutional duties.
Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Ban for All Babies, Testing Lower Court’s Power
The U.S. Supreme Court building is seen on November 13, 2023, in Washington, D.C., as the court announced a new ethics law following scandals surrounding gifts and holidays received by some justices.
“The framers understood that people would come to the table with different views,” Gorsuch told Fox News Digital. he said. “The goal is to reason together.”
Although ideological divisions are sharp, Gorsuch emphasized that the culture at the high court is built on mutual respect.
Click Here to Download Fox News App
“If you sit down and listen to someone long enough, you’ll find something you can agree on,” he added. “Maybe you can start there.”
Original article source: Gorsuch says ideological divides on Supreme Court are less about politics and more about ‘how you read the law’
