Howard government understood climate risks despite Kyoto stance

“The magnitude of the average temperature increase observed in Australia during the 20th century was greater than that observed globally,” the application states.

“The magnitude of climate change in Australia, combined with the marginal rainfall of many of our key agricultural areas and over-reliance on irrigation, will make Australia more vulnerable to climate change than most developed countries, including the United States and many European countries.”

Australia signed the Kyoto Protocol in 1998 but ultimately chose not to ratify it under the coalition government led by John Howard, citing the potential economic disadvantage compared to major emitters such as the United States and China.

The report predicts that Australia is on track to meet the Kyoto protocol target of 108 percent by 2012, and greenhouse gas emissions will reach 123 percent of 1990 levels by 2020.

He called on Cabinet to continue to work with the international community to develop a robust and comprehensive global response to climate change that is environmentally effective, economically efficient and does not impose an unfair burden on Australia.

Ruddock’s remarks suggest that the cabinet’s decision not to ratify Kyoto stemmed not from scientific ignorance but from a considered political judgment about Australia’s negotiating position and obligations.

“I’ve always been of the view that the world will solve this problem. But we need to make sure Australia does its part,” he said.

“If you look at what we saw tragically in NSW last week, it’s [clear]”I think it is important to review these documents and ensure that those who are considering these issues today are aware of the materials available to the Howard government,” he said.