Your Conduct Does Not Inspire Confidence, Why Did You Appear Before Committee: SC to Justice Varma
New Delhi: On Wednesday, the Supreme Court found that the behavior of Yashwant did not inspire confidence and found guilty of the abuse during cash discovery, asking an internal investigation panel to be invalid by an internal investigation panel. The upper court asked Justice Varma why he appeared before the in -house investigation committee, and that he was not challenging at that time and there.
He told the APEX court before the report of the in -house investigation panel.
A Justice Beach Datankar Datta and AG Masih, if a judge had materials to believe that the abuse, he said he could inform the president and the prime minister.
“It is a political decision whether or not to continue or continue. However, the judiciary should send a message to the society that the process is followed.”
Capil Sibal, a senior defender for the arrival of justice, said that his advice for the abolition of the internal investigation panel was contrary to the constitution.
Sibal told the court that the suggestion of the cases for this way would form a dangerous precedent.
Justice said that the cassette was released and his reputation was already damaged.
The upper court also attracted a lawyer Mathews J. Nedumpara, who was looking for a Fir Registration against Justice Varma.
During the hearing, Justice Dipankar Datta questioned Nedumpara whether he approached the police with an official complaint before he called a fir record.
The upper court reserves the order of Justice Varma on the procedure of the in -house investigation procedure and the advice of India to abolish its post.
In addition, Nedumpara has decided on a separate petition opened by Nedumpara to receive a bir registration.
At that time, justice asked Sanjiv Khanna, the chief justice of India, to be broken on May 8, and called on the parliament to initiate objection against him.
In his petition, justice said that the investigation “reversed the burden of proof” and required him to investigate and refute the accusations against him.
Justice, who claims that the findings of the panel are based on a predetermined narrative, are guided by the desire to rapidly conclude the procedures even at the expense of “procedural justice”.
The petition claimed that the investigation panel had drawn negative findings without making a full and fair hearing.
A report of the investigation panel investigating the incident, justice and family members, after a fire incident, a large half -burn cash cache on the store room where the hidden or active control of the store room, and proved the abuse of serious enough to be removed, he said.
Three judge panels headed by the Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana Supreme Court, conducted the investigation for 10 days, examined 55 witnesses and visited the accidental fire scene that started on March 14 at 11.35, and then a judge in the Supreme Court of Delhi.
Acting in the report, CJI Khanna wrote President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi by proposing the objection of the judge.
