In a dizzying few days, Trump ramps up attacks on political opponents and 1st Amendment

Washington – In recent days, President Trump used the weight of his office to accelerate a ordeal campaign against perceived political enemies and attacks on 1st change protection.

Only last week, Trump replaced a lawyer of a US lawyer’s political rivals in a loyal way, and led the Chief Public Prosecutor to find charges to file them against them.

The President of the Federal Communication Commission, journalists and comedians pointed to punishing actions against the networks he ran to the President.

Trump filed a $ 15 billion lawsuit against the New York Times. It was thrown by a judge.

Acting in Los Angeles, Gov. He asked Gavin Newsom to investigate a social media post by the press office.

Pentagon announced that it has imposed new restrictions on journalists covering the US army.

The White House officially labeled the “antifier olarak as a relaxed relationship of the left-wing supporters on the left as a“ domestic terrorists ”-Af law as a direct challenge for a appointment-specific speech protections. And he said that the deputies interested in legal predicate for strikes in the Caribbean should only overcome.

An active investigation on a bribery plan, including a payment of $ 50,000 to the president’s border consultant, was broken by the White House.

Trump said that he did not like a partisan fuel during the Sunday commemoration ceremony for the conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who said “He didn’t hate his competitors,” he said.

“This is where I don’t agree with Charlie, Tr Trump said. “I hate my competitors and I don’t want the best for them.”

Academicians and historians say that there is an extraordinary attack of public confidence that has been seen as the sacred referees of public confidence for decades.

The attack, just as the administration moves to protect its allies, only aims at democrats, liberal groups and organization institutions.

US lawyer Erik Siebert in Virginia, He resigned on Friday after encountering pressure Trump will bring criminal charges against New York Atty from the administration. Gene. Letitia James claimed the fraud. Later in that day, Trump claimed that he was “fired” in a social media post.

A few hours later, on Saturday, Trump said that Siebert, the White House, nominated Siebert’s best prosecution role in Virginia, and was “hard” and “loyal”.

Later on that day, Trump demanded Atty in a reference to a social media post that appealed to “pam .. General Pam Bondi-Eski FBI Director James Comey and Sen. Man Schiff (D-Calif.)

“We can no longer delay, kills our reputation and reliability, Tr Trump wrote. “They impressed me twice and accused me on anything (5 times!). Justice should be served, now !!!”

The White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday to target the former president for the former president for these corrupt fraudsters who abuse his duty and abuse his mission, and then a candidate for the highest office in the soil, Monda said the White House Press Secretary.

Leavitt told journalists, “the Ministry of Justice for those who armed the Ministry of Justice to demand accountability for those who armed the Ministry of Justice, and no one knows more than President Trump,” he said.

When the President called for the prosecution of political opponents, the White House border consultant Tom Homan was later reported to be the subject of a secret FBI case closed by Trump administrative authorities. HOMAN, According to MSNBCAfter he told them that he could get government contracts, he accepted $ 50,000 cash from secret agents.

On Monday, Leavitt said that Homan did not receive the money and that the investigation was “another example of Biden Ministry of Justice’s arming against one of the most powerful and vocal supporters of the President Trump.

“The White House and President Tom Homan stand by 100% because he didn’t do anything wrong,” he said.

Some see their latest actions as a change in the idea of ​​erosion and criminal investigation of a firewall between the Ministry of Justice and the White House.

“If the Ministry of Justice and any prosecution are working properly, these organizations are investigating crimes, not the people of the Ministry of Justice and any prosecution.

The Trump administration also carried narcotics and drug smugglers against the ships passing the Caribbean Sea, which left Venezuela. However, the targeted killing of individuals in the sea was concerned that the operation of the administration was unjustified among legal scholars, and democratic MPs, including Schiff, brought a bill that claimed that the ongoing campaign violated the decision of the war forces.

Political influence has long played a role with the federal prosecutors who have long been politically appointed, but Hasnas said, “It was largely enlarged under the current situation.”

“What is interesting about the current situation is that the Trump administration does not even try to hide it,” he said.

Schiff said that he saw this as an effort to çalışturma silence and scare ”. In July, Trump accused Schiff, who launched his first appeal investigation into Trump, of Schiff’s rejected mortgage fraud.

“What he wants to do is not just from me and Letitia James or Lisa Cook, but rather to send him a message that everyone who stands on anything that has courage to call his corruption will be a target and will go after you.” Schiff said in an interview on Sunday.

Trump praised Trump as the Free Speech Champion, including Most of the conservatives and most fiery supporters in the United States, which he claimed to have been widely censored by Biden administration, especially by Biden administration.

However, since Trump took office, he has repeatedly tried to silence his critics, including the media, and to destroy the speech that was not in harmony with politics.

And after Kirk was killed on September 10, according to constitutional scholars and media experts, these efforts became an unprecedented attack on free speech and expression.

UC Berkeley Dean of the Law Faculty Erwin Chezerinsky, “Management, the 1st change shows a striking ignorance and ignored,” he said.

Uz We are in an unprecedented place in terms of targeting the free press and the use of free speech, Ken Ken Paulson, former Editor of Usa Today and now Middle Tennessee State University Free Speech Center, said.

Paulson had periods such as red fear that Americans would surrender to the neighbors they thought were leaning to the left, but this is an uninterrupted, multi -faceted, multi -platform attack on all our free speech rights, Pa said Paulson. “Actually, I was quite surprised by the speed of this and his courage.”

Bondi recently frightened against the “hate speech ğı that the Supreme Court had previously defended.

FCC President Brendan Carr, Kimmel’in Kirk allegedly a killer after commenting on the murderer Jimmy Kimmel’i ABC and the main company threatened Disney. ABC quickly suspended Kimmel’s show, but Disney announced on Tuesday on Monday.

In the meantime, Pentagon said that news organizations would require not to accept any information that the government did not approve of release of the government, and that those who publish sensitive materials should not cancel the press identity information without approval.

Critics of the administration, free speech organizations and even the progressive left of the “cancellation culture” for a long time criticized some conservative experts, against some of these policies. Academics also say that the merger of actions taken by the administration represents a dangerous separation from the US law and tradition.

“What unites all this is, how clearly it is inconsistent with the 1st change, C Chemerinsky said.

Cheterinsky said that the sub -courts are constantly returning to the excessive access of the administration when it comes to protected speech and expecting that they will continue to do so.

In addition, the Supreme Court said that although he frequently included in disputes on policy decisions, he also defended the freedom of speech and hopes that some of the above -above free speech policies will continue if they reach the High Court.

Cheterinsky said, “If there is something that this court says over and over, the government cannot prevent or stop speech from the expression of the expression.”

Paulson said that American media companies should refuse to obey and continue to include the Trump administration and Pentagon as usual, and that the average Americans should recognize the seriousness of this censorship and talk against it, regardless of their political persuasion.

Paulson said, “This is a full gas attack on free conversation in real-America,” Paulson said. “And to do something about it will remain citizenship.”

Cheterinsky said that defending free conversation should be a problem that unites all Americans because at least political power has changed hands.

“It can be understood that ruling people want to silence the conversation they do not like, but the aim of the 1st change is to protect the conversation we do not like,” he said. “We don’t need a change in order to protect our favorite speech.”